Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 122 of the 122 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanisms and regulation of reduction‐based iron uptake in plants

SCHMIDT, WOLFGANG·1999·New Phytologist

Abstract

Despite the usually high abundance of iron (Fe) in soils, the low solubility of Fe‐bearing minerals restricts the available Fe pools in most aerobic soils to levels that are far below those required for microbial or plant growth. To acquire the necessary amounts of Fe from the environment, organisms have evolved mechanisms that enhance the solubility and dissolution rate of Fe(iii) oxyhydroxides prevailing in aerobic soils. Chemically, these mechanisms are based on weakening of the Fe–O bond by reduction, chelation and protonation. Physiologically, two distinct and in all known cases mutually exclusive strategies can be distinguished: the excretion of siderophores capable of solubilizing external ferric Fe and subsequent uptake of the ferric siderophore complex; and reduction of Fe(iii) prior to uptake of the more soluble Fe 2+ ion. With the exception of graminaceous species, in which Fe uptake is based on the former mechanism, the latter strategy is found in all cormophytes and certain algae, yeast and bacteria. In higher plants, the increase in their capacity to convert extracellular ferric to ferrous Fe is part of a series of physiological and morphological events that act in concert to achieve appropriate internal levels of Fe. It is this amalgam of features that determines the Fe efficiency of a species or cultivar that in turn affects the yield of economically important plants and the natural distribution of species. Adaptive changes to limited Fe availability have been studied at the molecular, physiological and whole‐plant level. This review summarises current knowledge of the components of reduction‐based Fe uptake in plants and presents an integrated view of the present understanding of mechanisms that control the rate and extent of Fe absorption by roots.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00331.x

Cites

122 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 122 references

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
SCHMIDT, W.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-01
Volume
141
Issue
1
Pages
1-26
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2050806334
Cited by
406
References
122
FWCI
21.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms and regulation of reduction‐based iron uptake in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00331.x
The paper
SCHMIDT, W. (1999). Mechanisms and regulation of reduction‐based iron uptake in plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00331.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.