The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zinc and cadmium hyperaccumulation by Thlaspi caerulescens from metalliferous and nonmetalliferous sites in the Mediterranean area: implications for phytoremediation
Open accessAbstract
Growth, tolerance and zinc and cadmium hyperaccumulation of Thlaspi caerulescens populations from three metal contaminated soils and three normal soils were compared under controlled conditions. Individuals of six populations were cultivated on five soils with increasing concentrations of zinc (50–25000 μg g−1) and cadmium (1–170 μg g−1). There was no mortality of normal soil populations in the four metal‐contaminated soils, but plant growth was reduced to half that of populations from metal‐contaminated soils. However, in noncontaminated soil, the growth of individuals from normal soils was greater than that of individuals from metal‐contaminated soils. Individuals from normal soils concentrated three times more zinc in the aboveground biomass than those from metal‐contaminated soils, but the latter accumulated twice as much cadmium. We conclude that populations of T. caerulescens from both normal and metal‐contaminated soils are interesting material for phytoextraction of zinc and cadmium, but to optimize the process of phytoextraction it is necessary to combine the extraction potentials of both type of populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accumulators and excluders ‐strategies in the response of plants to heavy metals
Baker, A. J. M. (1981) · Journal of Plant Nutrition · doi:10.1080/01904168109362867 · Cited by 2,233
Cited by
Heavy metal hyperaccumulating plants: how and why do they do it? And what makes them so interesting
Rascio, N., & Navari-Izzo, F. (2011) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.08.016 · Cited by 2,012
Thlaspi caerulescens, an attractive model species to study heavy metal hyperaccumulation in plants
Assunção, A. G. L., Schat, H., & Aarts, M. G. M. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00820.x · Cited by 358
Assunção, A. G. L., Martins, P. D. C., De Folter, S., Vooijs, R., Schat, H., & Aarts, M. G. M. (2001) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2001.00666.x · Cited by 350
Bert, V., Bonnin, I., Saumitou‐Laprade, P., De Laguérie, P., & Petit, D. (2002) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00432.x · Cited by 257
Reeves, R. D., Schwartz, C., Morel, J. L., & Edmondson, J. (2001) · International Journal of Phytoremediation · doi:10.1080/15226510108500054 · Cited by 222
Metadata
- Authors
- ESCARRÉ, J., LEFÈBVRE, C., GRUBER, W., LEBLANC, M., LEPART, J., RIVIÈRE, Y., & DELAY, B.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 429-437
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W1607581884
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zinc and cadmium hyperaccumulation by Thlaspi caerulescens from metalliferous and nonmetalliferous sites in the Mediterranean area: implications for phytoremediation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00599.x
- The paper
- ESCARRÉ, J., LEFÈBVRE, C., GRUBER, W., LEBLANC, M., LEPART, J., RIVIÈRE, Y., & DELAY, B. (2000). Zinc and cadmium hyperaccumulation by Thlaspi caerulescens from metalliferous and nonmetalliferous sites in the Mediterranean area: implications for phytoremediation. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00599.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
