The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Elevated atmospheric CO2, fine roots and the response of soil microorganisms: a review and hypothesis
Abstract
There is considerable uncertainty about how rates of soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling will change as CO 2 accumulates in the Earth's atmosphere. We summarized data from 47 published reports on soil C and N cycling under elevated CO 2 in an attempt to generalize whether rates will increase, decrease, or not change. Our synthesis centres on changes in soil respiration, microbial respiration, microbial biomass, gross N mineralization, microbial immobilization and net N mineralization, because these pools and processes represent important control points for the below‐ground flow of C and N. To determine whether differences in C allocation between plant life forms influence soil C and N cycling in a predictable manner, we summarized responses beneath graminoid, herbaceous and woody plants grown under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO 2. The below‐ground pools and processes that we summarized are characterized by a high degree of variability (coefficient of variation 80–800%), making generalizations within and between plant life forms difficult. With few exceptions, rates of soil and microbial respiration were more rapid under elevated CO 2, indicating that (1) greater plant growth under elevated CO 2 enhanced the amount of C entering the soil, and (2) additional substrate was being metabolized by soil microorganisms. However, microbial biomass, gross N mineralization, microbial immobilization and net N mineralization are characterized by large increases and declines under elevated CO 2, contributing to a high degree of variability within and between plant life forms. From this analysis we conclude that there are insufficient data to predict how microbial activity and rates of soil C and N cycling will change as the atmospheric CO 2 concentration continues to rise. We argue that current gaps in our understanding of fine‐root biology limit our ability to predict the response of soil microorganisms to rising atmospheric CO 2, and that understanding differences in fine‐root longevity and biochemistry between plant species are necessary for developing a predictive model of soil C and N cycling under elevated CO 2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carbon input by roots into the soil: Quantification of rhizodeposition from root to ecosystem scale
Pausch, J., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13850 · Cited by 1,010
Phillips, R. P., Finzi, A. C., & Bernhardt, E. S. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01570.x · Cited by 788
Ecological Lessons from Free-Air CO 2 Enrichment (FACE) Experiments
Norby, R. J., & Zak, D. R. (2011) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144647 · Cited by 681
Self-citationIncreased soil emissions of potent greenhouse gases under increased atmospheric CO2
van Groenigen, K. J., Osenberg, C. W., & Hungate, B. A. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10176 · Cited by 551
Responses of tree fine roots to temperature
PREGITZER, K. S., KING, J. S., BURTON, A. J., & BROWN, S. E. (2000) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00689.x · Cited by 517
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- ZAK, D. R., PREGITZER, K. S., KING, J. S., & HOLMES, W. E.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 201-222
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2096844430
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elevated atmospheric CO2, fine roots and the response of soil microorganisms: a review and hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00687.x
- The paper
- ZAK, D. R., PREGITZER, K. S., KING, J. S., & HOLMES, W. E. (2000). Elevated atmospheric CO2, fine roots and the response of soil microorganisms: a review and hypothesis. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00687.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.