The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tansley Review No. 116: Cyanobacterium–plant symbioses
Abstract
Cyanobacteria are an ancient, morphologically diverse group of prokaryotes with an oxygenic photosynthesis. Many cyanobacteria also possess the ability to fix N 2. Although well suited to an independent existence in nature, some cyanobacteria occur in symbiosis with a wide range of hosts (protists, animals and plants). Among plants, such symbioses have independently evolved in phylogenetically diverse genera belonging to the algae, fungi, bryophytes, pteridophytes, gymnosperms and angiosperms. These are N 2‐fixing symbioses involving heterocystous cyanobacteria, particularly Nostoc, as cyanobionts (cyanobacterial partners). A given host species associates with only a particular cyanobiont genus but such specificity does not extend to the strain level. The cyanobiont is located under a microaerobic environment in a variety of host organs and tissues (bladder, thalli and cephalodia in fungi; cavities in gametophytes of hornworts and liverworts or fronds of the Azolla sporophyte; coralloid roots in cycads; stem glands in Gunnera). Except for fungi, the hosts form these structures ahead of the cyanobiont infection. The symbiosis lasts for one generation except in Azolla and diatoms, in which it is perpetuated from generation to generation. Within each generation, multiple fresh infections occur as new symbiotic tissues and organs develop. The symbioses are stable over a wide range of environmental conditions, and sensing–signalling between partners ensures their synchronized growth and development. The cyanobiont population is kept constant in relation to the host biomass through controlled initiation and infection, nutrient supply and cell division. In most cases, the partners have remained facultative, with the cyanobiont residing extracellularly in the host. However, in the water‐fern Azolla and the freshwater diatom Rhopalodia the association is obligate. The cyanobionts occur intracellularly in diatoms, the fungus Geosiphon and the angiosperm Gunner a. Close cell–cell contact and the development of special structures ensure efficient nutrient exchange between the partners. The mobile nutrients are normal products of the donor cells, although their production is increased in symbiosis. Establishment of cyanobacterial–plant symbioses differs from chloroplast evolution. In these symbioses, the cyanobiont undergoes structural–functional changes suited to its role as provider of fixed N rather than fixed C, and the level of intimacy is far less than that of an organelle. This review provides an updated account of cyanobacterial–plant symbioses, particularly concerning developments during the past 10 yr. Various aspects of these symbioses such as initiation and development, symbiont diversity, recognition and signalling, structural–functional modifications, integration, and nutrient exchange are reviewed and discussed, as are evolutionary aspects and the potential uses of cyanobacterial–plant symbioses. Finally we outline areas that require special attention for future research. Not only will these provide information of academic interest but they will also help to improve the use of Azolla as green manure, to enable us to establish artificial N 2‐fixing associations with cereals such as rice, and to allow the manipulation of free‐living cyanobacteria for photobiological ammonia or hydrogen production or for use as biofertilizers. contents Summary 449 I. introduction 450 II. the partners 451 III. initiation and development of symbioses 458 IV. the symbioses 462 V. evolutionary aspects 472 VI. artificial symbioses 474 VII. future outlook and perspectives 475 Acknowledgements 477 References 477
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chlorophyll b and phycobilins in the common ancestor of cyanobacteria and chloroplasts
Tomitani, A., Okada, K., Miyashita, H., Matthijs, H. C. P., Ohno, T., & Tanaka, A. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/22101 · Cited by 220
Cited by
Van Der Heijden, M. G. A., Bardgett, R. D., & Van Straalen, N. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x · Cited by 5,053
The Role of Bryophytes in Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling
Turetsky, M. R. (2003) · The Bryologist · doi:10.1639/05 · Cited by 561
Meeks, J. C., & Elhai, J. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.1.94-121.2002 · Cited by 429
Microalgae, Soil and Plants: A Critical Review of Microalgae as Renewable Resources for Agriculture
Alvarez, A. L., Weyers, S. L., Goemann, H. M., Peyton, B. M., & Gardner, R. D. (2021) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2021.102200 · Cited by 376
Cyanobacteria as a source of biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture
Chittora, D., Meena, M., Barupal, T., Swapnil, P., & Sharma, K. (2020) · Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100737 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- RAI, A. N., SÖDERBÄCK, E., & BERGMAN, B.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 449-481
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2167493176
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tansley Review No. 116: Cyanobacterium–plant symbioses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00720.x
- The paper
- RAI, A. N., SÖDERBÄCK, E., & BERGMAN, B. (2000). Tansley Review No. 116: Cyanobacterium–plant symbioses. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00720.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.