The DOI matches its Crossref record; 220 of the 222 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant resistance towards insect herbivores: a dynamic interaction
Abstract
Summary: Plant defences against insect herbivores can be divided into ‘static’ or constitutive defences, and ‘active’ or induced defences, although the insecticidal compounds or proteins involved are often the same. Induced defences have aspects common to all plants, whereas the accumulation of constitutive defences is species‐specific. Insect herbivores activate induced defences both locally and systemically by signalling pathways involving systemin, jasmonate, oligogalacturonic acid and hydrogen peroxide. Plants also respond to insect attack by producing volatiles, which can be used to deter herbivores, to communicate between parts of the plant, or between plants, to induce defence responses. Plant volatiles are also an important component in indirect defence. Herbivorous insects have adapted to tolerate plant defences, and such adaptations can also be constitutive or induced. Insects whose plant host range is limited are more likely to show constitutive adaptation to the insecticidal compounds they will encounter, whereas insects which feed on a wide range of plant species often use induced adaptations to overcome plant defences. Both plant defence and insect adaptation involve a metabolic cost, and in a natural system most plant–insect interactions involving herbivory reach a ‘stand‐off’ where both host and herbivore survive but develop suboptimally. Contents Summary 145 I. Introduction 146 II. Accumulation of defensive compounds and induced resistance 146 III. Signalling pathways in wound‐induced resistance 147 IV. Insect modulation of the wounding response 155 V. Insects which evade the wounding response 156 VI. Insect‐induced emission of volatiles and tritrophic interactions 157 VII. Insect adaptation to plant defences 160 Conclusions 163 Acknowlegements 163 References 163
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Alternatively, when the herbivore is the initial agent, plants frequently activate metabolic pathways that produce jasmonic acid that, in turn, cascade many metabolic signals involved in disease resistance (1,20,23,24).”
Citations
Cites
Items 201–220 of 220
Veau, E. J. I. D., & Schultz, J. C. (1992) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf00994367 · Cited by 55
McKenzie, C. L., Shatters, R. G., Doostdar, H., Lee, S. D., Inbar, M., & Mayer, R. T. (2002) · Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1002/arch.10020 · Cited by 54
Weißbecker, B., van Loon, J. J. A., & Dicke, M. (1999) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1023/a:1020825924703 · Cited by 53
Methyl Jasmonate Exposure Induces Insect Resistance in Cabbage and Tobacco
Avdiushko, S. A., Brown, G. C., Dahlman, D. L., & Hildebrand, D. F. (1997) · Environmental Entomology · doi:10.1093/ee/26.3.642 · Cited by 49
Plasticity in allocation of nicotine to reproductive parts inNicotiana attenuata
Baldwin, I. T., & Karb, M. J. (1995) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf02033797 · Cited by 48
Dombrowski, J. E., Pearce, G., & Ryan, C. A. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.22.12947 · Cited by 45
Li, L., & Howe, G. A. (2001) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1010645330275 · Cited by 44
Turunen, S. P., & Crailsheim, K. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1519-0_11 · Cited by 42
Desikan, R. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/50.341.1863 · Cited by 41
Shiojiri, K., Takabayashi, J., Yano, S., & Takafuji, A. (2000) · Applied Entomology and Zoology · doi:10.1303/aez.2000.519 · Cited by 40
Baldwin, I. T., & Ohnmeiss, T. E. (1994) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00324228 · Cited by 40
Ethylene negatively regulates local expression of plant defense lectin genes
Zhu‐Salzman, K., Salzman, R. A., Koiwa, H., Murdock, L. L., Bressan, R. A., & Hasegawa, P. M. (1998) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.1998.1040311.x · Cited by 35
MAINGUET, A. M., Louveaux, A., Sayed, G. E., & Rollin, P. (2000) · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · doi:10.1046/j.1570-7458.2000.00632.x · Cited by 35
Peritrophic envelope as a functional antioxidant
Summers, C. B., & Felton, G. W. (1996) · Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6327(1996)32:1 · Cited by 34
Guillet, G., Podeszfinski, C., Régnault-Roger, C., Arnason, J. T., & Philogène, B. J. R. (2000) · Environmental Entomology · doi:10.1603/0046-225x(2000)029[0135:babaog]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 34
Kodama, H., Nishiuchi, T., Seo, S., Ohashi, Y., & Iba, K. (2000) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s0168-9452(00)00210-7 · Cited by 29
Ortego, F., Novillo, C., Sánchez‐Serrano, J. J., & Castañera, P. (2001) · Journal of Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1910(01)00118-4 · Cited by 24
Jacinto, T., McGurl, B., & Ryan, C. A. (1999) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s0168-9452(98)00206-4 · Cited by 8
Feldman, J., & Stone, T. B. (2010) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203211731_chapter_3 · Cited by 7
Pena-Cortes, H., Prat, S., Atzorn, R., Wasternack, C., & Willmitzer, L. (1996) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Garcia‐Olmedo F, 1987, Plant proteinaceous inhibitors of proteinases and α‐amylases, Oxford Surveys of Plant Molecular and Cell Biology, 4, 275
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Plant Immunity to Insect Herbivores
Howe, G. A., & Jander, G. (2007) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092825 · Cited by 2,493
Plant Defense Against Herbivores: Chemical Aspects
Mithöfer, A., & Boland, W. (2012) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103854 · Cited by 1,669
Mao, Y.-B., Cai, W.-J., Wang, J.-W., Hong, G.-J., Tao, X.-Y., Wang, L.-J., Huang, Y.-P., & Chen, X.-Y. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1352 · Cited by 1,358
Bacterial Volatiles Induce Systemic Resistance in Arabidopsis
Ryu, C.-M., Farag, M. A., Hu, C.-H., Reddy, M. S., Kloepper, J. W., & Paré, P. W. (2004) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.103.026583 · Cited by 1,308
Plant Defense against Insect Herbivores
Fürstenberg-Hägg, J., Zagrobelny, M., & Bak, S. (2013) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms140510242 · Cited by 933
Metadata
- Authors
- Gatehouse, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gatehouse, John A.
- ORCID
- Gatehouse, John A.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-10-21
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-169
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2160819466
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 222
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Phytologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Forest Insect Ecology and Management
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
- Keywords
- plant-insect interactions, phytophagous insects, induced plant defense, systemin, jasmonates, oligogalacturonides, hydrogen peroxide, plant volatiles, indirect defense, tritrophic interactions, insecticidal compounds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
