Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 386

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in young forest stands regenerating after clearcut logging

Jones, Melanie D., Durall, Daniel M., Cairney, John W. G.·2003·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: The effects on the ectomycorrhizal fungal community of clearcut logging, which is used to harvest millions of hectares of ectomycorrhizal forest annually, has been studied for a number of years. Here, we review current knowledge of inoculum sources for ectomycorrhizal fungi in forests and then re‐examine earlier studies of ectomycorrhizas on young trees in regenerating stands. We conclude that, taken separately from the effects of site preparation, the major impact of clearcut logging is to change the species composition of the ectomycorrhizal fungal community rather than to reduce the percentage of roots colonized. A thorough examination of site preparation treatments suggests that the changes in fungal species composition are driven by changes in the biology and chemistry of the soil environment after clearcutting as much as they are by loss or change in fungal inoculum. This is an important conclusion because it implies that these new ectomycorrhizal fungal communities are better adapted to the new conditions than the ones in the forest would have been. The shift in fungal species composition and diversity will have implications for seedling establishment and competition. The effects of individual fungi or diverse assemblages of fungi on seedling growth, and effects of changes in the ability of young trees to associate with a common mycelium are discussed.ContentsSummary399I.Introduction400II.Population biology and inoculum potential of ectomycorrhizal fungi401III.Ectomycorrhiza development on seedlings regenerating after clearcut logging402IV.Which is the most important factor driving changes in the ECM fungal community after clearcut logging: inoculum loss or change in the below‐ground environment?406V.Possible consequences for regenerating stands of species shifts in ectomycorrhizal fungi414VI.Conclusions416

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00698.x

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Cited by

See all 386

Metadata

Authors
Jones, M. D., Durall, D. M., & Cairney, J. W. G.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-03
Volume
157
Issue
3
Pages
399-422
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2110385382
Cited by
386
References
70
FWCI
18.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in young forest stands regenerating after clearcut logging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00698.x
The paper
Jones, M. D., Durall, D. M., & Cairney, J. W. G. (2003). Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in young forest stands regenerating after clearcut logging. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00698.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.