The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in young forest stands regenerating after clearcut logging
Abstract
Summary: The effects on the ectomycorrhizal fungal community of clearcut logging, which is used to harvest millions of hectares of ectomycorrhizal forest annually, has been studied for a number of years. Here, we review current knowledge of inoculum sources for ectomycorrhizal fungi in forests and then re‐examine earlier studies of ectomycorrhizas on young trees in regenerating stands. We conclude that, taken separately from the effects of site preparation, the major impact of clearcut logging is to change the species composition of the ectomycorrhizal fungal community rather than to reduce the percentage of roots colonized. A thorough examination of site preparation treatments suggests that the changes in fungal species composition are driven by changes in the biology and chemistry of the soil environment after clearcutting as much as they are by loss or change in fungal inoculum. This is an important conclusion because it implies that these new ectomycorrhizal fungal communities are better adapted to the new conditions than the ones in the forest would have been. The shift in fungal species composition and diversity will have implications for seedling establishment and competition. The effects of individual fungi or diverse assemblages of fungi on seedling growth, and effects of changes in the ability of young trees to associate with a common mycelium are discussed.ContentsSummary399I.Introduction400II.Population biology and inoculum potential of ectomycorrhizal fungi401III.Ectomycorrhiza development on seedlings regenerating after clearcut logging402IV.Which is the most important factor driving changes in the ECM fungal community after clearcut logging: inoculum loss or change in the below‐ground environment?406V.Possible consequences for regenerating stands of species shifts in ectomycorrhizal fungi414VI.Conclusions416
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2002) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-652840-4.x5000-1 · Cited by 1,580
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-4491 · Cited by 1,177
Net transfer of carbon between ectomycorrhizal tree species in the field
Simard, S. W., Perry, D. A., Jones, M. D., Myrold, D. D., Durall, D. M., & Molina, R. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/41557 · Cited by 1,053
Self-citationThe molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: peeking into the black‐box
Horton, T. R., & Bruns, T. D. (2001) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01333.x · Cited by 876
Mycorrhizas in Natural Ecosystems
Brundrett, M. (1991) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60099-9 · Cited by 780
Fire and vegetation dynamics: studies from the North American boreal forest
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5586 · Cited by 764
Ecological Interactions in Soil.
MacFadyen, A., & Fitter, A. H. (1986) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2260281 · Cited by 763
Wardle, D. A., Bonner, K. I., & Nicholson, K. S. (1997) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3546010 · Cited by 723
Molina, R. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 629
Mycorrhizal Functioning. An Integrative Plant Fungal Process.
Newman, E. I., & Allen, M. F. (1994) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261311 · Cited by 620
Cited by
Forest microbiome: diversity, complexity and dynamics
Baldrian, P. (2016) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuw040 · Cited by 710
Mycorrhizal networks: Mechanisms, ecology and modelling
Simard, S. W., Beiler, K. J., Bingham, M. A., Deslippe, J. R., Philip, L. J., & Teste, F. P. (2012) · Fungal Biology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.fbr.2012.01.001 · Cited by 593
Hartmann, M., Howes, C. G., VanInsberghe, D., Yu, H., Bachar, D., Christen, R., Henrik Nilsson, R., Hallam, S. J., & Mohn, W. W. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.84 · Cited by 320
Burke, D. J., Weintraub, M. N., Hewins, C. R., & Kalisz, S. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.12.014 · Cited by 259
Fire Reduces Fungal Species Richness and In Situ Mycorrhizal Colonization: A Meta-Analysis
Dove, N. C., & Hart, S. C. (2017) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.4996/fireecology.130237746 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, M. D., Durall, D. M., & Cairney, J. W. G.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 399-422
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2110385382
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 18.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in young forest stands regenerating after clearcut logging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00698.x
- The paper
- Jones, M. D., Durall, D. M., & Cairney, J. W. G. (2003). Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in young forest stands regenerating after clearcut logging. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00698.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.