Fire Reduces Fungal Species Richness and In Situ Mycorrhizal Colonization: A Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Soil fungal communities perform many functions that help plants meet their nutritional demands. However, overall trends for fungal response to fire, which can be especially critical in a post-fire context, have been difficult to elucidate. We used meta-analytical techniques to investigate fungal response to fire across studies, ecosystems, and fire types. Change in fungal species richness and mycorrhizal colonization were used as the effect size metrics in random effects models. When different types of methods for assessing fungal species richness and mycorrhizal colonization were considered together, there was an average reduction of 28 % in fungal species richness post fire, but no significant response in mycorrhizal colonization. In contrast, there was a 41 % reduction in fungal species richness post fire when assessed by sporocarp surveys, but fungal species richness was not significantly affected when assessed by molecular methods. Measured in situ , fire reduced mycorrhizal colonization by 21 %, yet no significant response occurred when assessed by ex situ bioassays. These findings suggest that the putative magnitude of fire effects on soil fungal communities may be dependent on the approach and assessment method used. Furthermore, biome, but not fire type (i.e., wildfire versus prescribed fire) was a significant moderator of our categorical models, suggesting that biome might be a more useful predictor of fungal species richness response to fire than fire type. Reductions in fungal species richness and in situ mycorrhizal colonization post fire declined logarithmically and approached zero (i.e., no effect) at 22 and 11 years, respectively. We concluded that fire reduces fungal species richness and in situ mycorrhizal colonization, but if conditions allow communities to recover (e.g., without subsequent disturbance, favorable growing conditions), soil fungi are resilient on decadal time scales; the resiliency of soil fungi likely contributes to the overall rapid ecosystem recovery following fire.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Responses of fungal species to fire can be ephemeral.
“Overall, fire decreases bacterial biomass and diversity, fungal species richness and mycorrhizal colonization, although responses of fungal species can be ephemeral (Dove & Hart, 2017).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Dove & Hart, 2017
Fire decreases bacterial biomass and diversity.
“Overall, fire decreases bacterial biomass and diversity, fungal species richness and mycorrhizal colonization, although responses of fungal species can be ephemeral (Dove & Hart, 2017).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Dove & Hart, 2017
Fire decreases fungal species richness and mycorrhizal colonization.
“Overall, fire decreases bacterial biomass and diversity, fungal species richness and mycorrhizal colonization, although responses of fungal species can be ephemeral (Dove & Hart, 2017).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Dove & Hart, 2017
Cites
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704 · see citing works
The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire
Bond, W. J., Woodward, F. I., & Midgley, G. F. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01252.x · Cited by 1,942 · see citing works
Post-fire vegetation and fuel development influences fire severity patterns in reburns
Coppoletta, M., Merriam, K. E., & Collins, B. M. (2016) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/15-0225 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
“Overall, fire decreases bacterial biomass and diversity, fungal species richness and mycorrhizal colonization, although responses of fungal species can be ephemeral (Dove & Hart, 2017).”
Pingree, M. R. A., & Kobziar, L. N. (2019) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.032 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dove, N. C., & Hart, S. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Merced (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dove, Nicholas C.
- Venue
- Fire Ecology
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 37-65
- ISSN
- 1933-9747 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2745091418
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Fire Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- University of California Merced
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
- Keywords
- mycorrhizal colonization, post-fire recovery, fire types, ecosystem recovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review