Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 305

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Screening for chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester using ultrasound and maternal serum biochemistry in a one‐stop clinic: a review of three years prospective experience

Spencer, Kevin, Spencer, Christine E., Power, Maureen, Dawson, Carolynne, Nicolaides, Kypros H.·2003·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the performance of a one‐stop multidisciplinary clinic of screening for fetal chromosomal anomalies in the first trimester of pregnancy by a combination of maternal serum biochemistry and ultrasonography. Design Retrospective review of screening performance. Setting District General Hospital maternity unit. Population All women booked for routine antenatal care at Harold Wood Hospital between 1 June 1998 and 31 May 2001. The population included 12,339 women with singleton pregnancies presenting at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Methods Women were offered screening using a combination of maternal serum free β‐hCG and pregnancy associated plasma protein‐A (PAPP‐A) and fetal nuchal translucency thickness. Those with an estimated risk of ≥1 in 300 of carrying a fetus with trisomy 21 or trisomy 18 or trisomy 13 were offered the option of an invasive diagnostic test. Follow up of the outcome of all pregnancies was carried out. Main outcome measures Uptake of screening and invasive testing, detection rate for fetal chromosomal abnormalities and false positive rate. Results The uptake of first trimester screening was 97.5% and the uptake of invasive testing in the increased risk group was 77%. The rate of detection of trisomy 21 was 92% (23 of 25), of trisomy 13 or 18 was 100% (all 15) and of all aneuploidies was 96% (49 of 51). The false positive rate was 5.2%. Conclusion First trimester screening for trisomy 21 and other aneuploidies can be delivered in an efficient manner in a one‐stop multidisciplinary clinic. The detection rates are far better than can be achieved by second trimester serum screening.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02246.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 305

Metadata

Authors
Spencer, K., Spencer, C. E., Power, M., Dawson, C., & Nicolaides, K. H.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-03
Volume
110
Issue
3
Pages
281-286
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2028417117
Cited by
305
References
1
FWCI
24.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening for chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester using ultrasound and maternal serum biochemistry in a one‐stop clinic: a review of three years prospective experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02246.x
The paper
Spencer, K., Spencer, C. E., Power, M., Dawson, C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2003). Screening for chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester using ultrasound and maternal serum biochemistry in a one‐stop clinic: a review of three years prospective experience. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02246.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.