The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimating Hydroxyl Radical Content in Rat Brain Using Systemic and Intraventricular Salicylate: Impact of Methamphetamine
Abstract
Abstract: Free radicals have been implicated in the etiology of many neurodegenerative conditions. Yet, because these species are highly reactive and thus short‐lived it has been difficult to test these hypotheses. We adapted a method in which hydroxyl radicals are trapped by salicylate in vivo, resulting in the stable and quantifiable products, 2,3‐dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHBA) and 2,5‐DHBA. After systemic (100 mg/kg i.p.) or intraventricular (4 µmol) administration of salicylate, the amount of DHBA in striatal tissue correlated with tissue levels of salicylate. After systemic salicylate, the ratio of total DHBA to salicylate in neostriatum was at least 10‐fold higher than that observed after central salicylate. In addition, systemic salicylate resulted in considerably higher concentrations of 2,3‐ and 2,5‐DHBA in plasma than in brain. Therefore, a large portion of the DHBA present in brain after systemic salicylate may have been formed in the periphery. A neurotoxic regimen of methamphetamine increased the concentration of DHBA in neostriatum after either central or systemic administration of salicylate. The increase in 2,3‐DHBA after the central administration of salicylate was significant at 2 h, but not at 4 h, after the last dose of methamphetamine. These results suggest that (1) when assessing specific events in brain, it is preferable to administer salicylate centrally, and (2) neurotoxic doses of methamphetamine increase the hydroxyl radical content in brain in a time‐dependent manner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antioxidant defence mechanisms: From the beginning to the end (of the beginning)
Halliwell, B. (1999) · Free Radical Research · doi:10.1080/10715769900300841 · Cited by 1,020
Invited Review Free radicals and the pathobiology of brain dopamine systems
Cadet, J. L., & Brannock, C. (1998) · Neurochemistry International · doi:10.1016/s0197-0186(97)00031-4 · Cited by 499
LaVoie, M. J., & Hastings, T. G. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-04-01484.1999 · Cited by 447
Self-citationCadet, J. L., Jayanthi, S., & Deng, X. (2003) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.03-0073rev · Cited by 286
Yamamoto, B. K., & Raudensky, J. (2008) · Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s11481-008-9121-7 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Giovanni, A., Liang, L. P., Hastings, T. G., & Zigmond, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1819-1825
- ISSN
- 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-4159
- OpenAlex
- W2003622444
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating Hydroxyl Radical Content in Rat Brain Using Systemic and Intraventricular Salicylate: Impact of Methamphetamine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.64041819.x
- The paper
- Giovanni, A., Liang, L. P., Hastings, T. G., & Zigmond, M. J. (1995). Estimating Hydroxyl Radical Content in Rat Brain Using Systemic and Intraventricular Salicylate: Impact of Methamphetamine. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.64041819.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.