The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Presenilin endoproteolysis mediated by an aspartyl protease activity pharmacologically distinct from γ‐secretase
Abstract
Presenilin (PS)‐dependent γ‐secretase cleavage is the final proteolytic step in generating amyloid β protein (Aβ), a key peptide involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. PS undergoes endoproteolysis by an unidentified ‘presenilinase’ to generate the functional N‐terminal and C‐terminal fragment heterodimers (NTF/CTF) that may harbor the γ‐secretase active site. To better understand the relationship between presenilinase and γ‐secretase, we characterized the biochemical properties of presenilinase and compared them with those of γ‐secretase. Similar to γ‐secretase, presenilinase was most active at acidic pH 6.3. Aspartyl protease inhibitor pepstatin A blocked presenilinase activity with an IC 50 of ∼ 1 µ m. Difluoroketone aspartyl protease transition state analogue MW167 was relatively selective for presenilinase (IC 50 < 1 µ m) over γ‐secretase (IC 50−16 µ m). Importantly, removing the transition state mimicking moiety simultaneously abolished both presenilinase and γ‐secretase inhibition, suggesting that presenilinase, like γ‐secretase, is an aspartyl protease. Interestingly, several of the most potent γ‐secretase inhibitors (IC 50 = 0.3 or 20 n m) failed to block presenilinase activity. Although de novo generation of PS1 fragments coincided with production of Aβ in vitro, blocking presenilinase activity without reducing pre‐existing fragment levels permitted normal de novo generation of Aβ and amyloid intracellular domain. Therefore, presenilinase has characteristics of an aspartyl protease, but this activity is distinct from γ‐secretase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Presenilins are acidic proteinases with an optimum pH of 6.3.
“Presenilins are acidic proteinases [optimum pH 6.3, (Campbell et al., 2003)] that belong to the family of seven transmembrane domain proteins.”
From Emerging Alternative Proteinases in APP Metabolism and Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis: A Focus on MT1-MMP and MT5-MMP (2019) · cites this paper as Campbell et al., 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wolfe, M. S., Xia, W., Moore, C. L., Leatherwood, D. D., Ostaszewski, B., Rahmati, T., Donkor, I. O., & Selkoe, D. J. (1999) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi982562p · Cited by 289
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- 10.1074/jbc.M103075200 · DOI
- Beynon R., 2001, A Practical Approach, 317
- 10.1021/bi015810h · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1058783 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncb1201-1129 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.93.23.13170 · DOI
- 10.1038/34910 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00012.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.132277899 · DOI
- 10.1038/35017062 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.052436599 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi002770t · DOI
- 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00189-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0197-4580(98)00029-3 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.261463298 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.022523499 · DOI
- 10.1038/35017105 · DOI
- Hines V. Z. W., 1994, The expression and processing of human beta‐amyloid peptide precursors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: evidence for a novel endopeptidase in the yeast secretory system, Cell Mol. Biol. Res., 40, 273
- 10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00105-8 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1550 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.275.5.3173 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.C100447200 · DOI
- Kimberly W. T., 2003, γ‐Secretase is a membrane protein complex of presenilin, nicastrin, aph‐1 and pen‐2, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 10.1073/pnas.1037392100 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.271.45.28655 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M208164200 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.211321898 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.110126897 · DOI
- 10.1038/35015085 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1096/fj.00-0286fje · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06922.x · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M002812200 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0925-4439(01)00098-9 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02465.x · DOI
- 10.1006/nbdi.1997.0129 · DOI
- 10.1093/hmg/11.9.1037 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.102192599 · DOI
- Seiffert D., 2000, Presenilin‐1 and 2 are molecular targets for γ secretase inhibitors, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 34086, 10.1074/jbc.M005430200 · DOI
- 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.741 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/bi991728z · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.273.48.32322 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi9914210 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.274.40.28669 · DOI
- 10.1038/35041097 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.C200469200 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80291-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02802-8 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1070925 · DOI
- 10.1021/jm970621b · DOI
- 10.1038/19077 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.94.15.8208 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.272.12.7977 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi9816195 · DOI
- 10.1006/nbdi.2000.0322 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.97.16.9299 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.132045399 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M110871200 · DOI
- 10.1038/35024009 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.274.13.8966 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi0028800 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
García-González, L., Pilat, D., Baranger, K., & Rivera, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2019.00244 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, W. A., Reed, M. L. O., Strahle, J., Wolfe, M. S., & Xia, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-05-13
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1563-1574
- ISSN
- 0022-3042
- 1471-4159
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review