The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Making Consistent IUCN Classifications under Uncertainty
Abstract
Abstract: The World Conservation Union (IUCN) defined a set of categories for conservation status supported by decision rules based on thresholds of parameters such as distributional range, population size, population history, and risk of extinction. These rules have received international acceptance and have become one of the most important decision tools in conservation biology because of their wide applicability, objectivity, and simplicity of use. The input data for these rules are often estimated with considerable uncertainty due to measurement error, natural variation, and vagueness in definitions of parameters used in the rules. Currently, no specific guidelines exist for dealing with uncertainty. Interpretation of uncertain data by different assessors may lead to inconsistent classifications because attitudes toward uncertainty and risk may have an important influence on the classification of threatened species. We propose a method of dealing with uncertainty that can be applied to the current IUCN criteria without altering the rules, thresholds, or intent of these criteria. Our method propagates the uncertainty in the input parameters and assigns the evaluated species either to a single category (as the current criteria do) or to a range of plausible categories, depending on the nature and extent of uncertainties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays
Dulvy, N. K., Fowler, S. L., Musick, J. A., Cavanagh, R. D., Kyne, P. M., Harrison, L. R., Carlson, J. K., Davidson, L. N., Fordham, S. V., Francis, M. P., et al. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.00590 · Cited by 2,047
Evidence for the Role of Infectious Disease in Species Extinction and Endangerment
SMITH, K. F., SAX, D. F., & LAFFERTY, K. D. (2006) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00524.x · Cited by 548
Recent ecological responses to climate change support predictions of high extinction risk
Maclean, I. M. D., & Wilson, R. J. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1017352108 · Cited by 339
Mooers, A. Ø., Faith, D. P., & Maddison, W. P. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003700 · Cited by 163
Detecting Extinction Risk from Climate Change by IUCN Red List Criteria
KEITH, D. A., MAHONY, M., HINES, H., ELITH, J., REGAN, T. J., BAUMGARTNER, J. B., HUNTER, D., HEARD, G. W., MITCHELL, N. J., PARRIS, K. M., et al. (2014) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12234 · Cited by 97
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Akçakaya, H. R., Ferson, S., Burgman, M. A., Keith, D. A., Mace, G. M., & Todd, C. R.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-08-15
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1001-1013
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2085853578
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 72.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making Consistent IUCN Classifications under Uncertainty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99125.x
- The paper
- Akçakaya, H. R., Ferson, S., Burgman, M. A., Keith, D. A., Mace, G. M., & Todd, C. R. (2000). Making Consistent IUCN Classifications under Uncertainty. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99125.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.