CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 242Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementForest Management and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Historic Fire Regime in Southern California Shrublands

Open access
Keeley, Jon E., Fotheringham, C. J.·2001·Conservation Biology
DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00097.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Abstract: Historical variability in fire regime is a conservative indicator of ecosystem sustainability, and thus understanding the natural role of fire in chaparral ecosystems is necessary for proper fire management. It has been suggested that the “natural” fire regime was one of frequent small fires that fragmented the landscape into a fine‐grained mixture of age classes that precluded large, catastrophic fires. Some researchers claim that this regime was lost because of highly effective fire suppression and conclude that if fire managers could “restore” a regime of frequent fires with widespread prescription burning, they could eliminate the hazard of catastrophic fires. The primary evidence in support of this model is a study that compared contemporary burning patterns in southern California, U.S.A., a region subject to fire suppression, with patterns in northern Baja California, Mexico, where there is less effective fire suppression. We found that differences in fire regime between these two regions are inconclusive and could not be ascribed conclusively to differences in fire suppression. Historical records suggest that the natural fire regime in southern California shrublands was rather coarse‐grained and not substantively different from the contemporary regime. There is no evidence that fire‐management policies have created the contemporary fire regime dominated by massive Santa Ana wind‐driven fires. Increased expenditures on fire suppression and increased loss of property and lives are the result of human demographic patterns that place increasing demand on fire‐suppression forces.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00097.x

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Amaya S., 1991, Discussion
  2. Barrett L. A., 1935, A record of forest and field fires in California from the days of the early explorers to the creation of the forest reserves
  3. Bonnicksen T. M., 1979, Persistence of a fire exclusion policy in southern California: a biosocial interpretation., Journal of Environmental Management, 8, 277
  4. Brown W. S., 1945, History of the Los Padres National Forest, 1898–1945
  5. Brown W. S., 1944, California rural land use and management
  6. California Division of Forestry, 1978, Brushland range improvement
  7. Clar C. R., 1959, California government and forestry from Spanish days until the creation of the Department of Natural Resources in 1927
  8. Coleman R. J., 1996, California's I‐Zone, 12
  9. Countryman C. M., 1974, Can southern California wildland conflagrations be stopped? General technical note 7
  10. Davis D. F., 1977, California: summer under fire., American Forests, 83, 8
  11. Davis J. B., 1989, Proceedings of the symposium on fire and watershed management. General technical report 109, 38
  12. Freedman J. R., 1984, Uncontrolled fire and chaparral resilience in the Sierra Juarez, Baja California, Mexico
  13. Greenlee J. M., 1982, History of wildland fires in the Gabilan Mountains region of central coastal California
  14. Haiman R. L., 1973, The biological environment and its modification by man in the Sierra de Juarez, Baja California, Mexico
  15. Henderson D. A., 1964, Agriculture and livestock raising in the evolution of the economy and culture of the state of Baja California, Mexico
  16. Keeley J. E., 1998, Large forest fires, 69
  17. Keeley J. E., 1989, The California chaparral, 151
  18. Kinney A., 1887, First biennial report
  19. Knowles C., 1953, Vegetation burning by California Indians as shown by early records
  20. Krausmann W. J., 1981, An analysis of several variables affecting fire occurrence and size in San Diego County, California
  21. Lee R. G., 1978, Brushland watershed fire management policy in southern California: biosocial considerations
  22. Leiberg J. B., 1899, San Jacinto Forest Reserve., U.S. Geological Survey Annual Report, 19, 351
  23. Leiberg J. B., 1899, San Bernardino Forest Reserve., U.S. Geological Survey Annual Report, 19, 359
  24. Leiberg J. B., 1899, San Gabriel Forest Reserve., U.S. Geological Survey Annual Report, 19, 367
  25. Leiberg J. B., 1900, San Gabriel Forest Reserve., U.S. Geological Survey Annual Report, 20, 411
  26. Leiberg J. B., 1900, San Bernardino Forest Reserve., U.S. Geological Survey Annual Report, 20, 429
  27. Leiberg J. B., 1900, San Jacinto Forest Reserve., U.S. Geological Survey Annual Report, 20, 455
  28. Millar C. I., 1997, Sixth biennial watershed management conference, 105
  29. Minnich R. A., 1978, The geography of fire and conifer forests in the eastern transverse ranges, California
  30. Minnich R. A., 1989, The California chaparral, 37
  31. Minnich R. A., 1998, Large forest fires, 133
  32. Minnich R. A., 1991, California watersheds at the urban interface. Report 75, 67
  33. Minnich R. A., 1998, Land of chamise and pines
  34. Minnich R. A., 1999, Letters to the editor., Fremontia, 27, 31
  35. Moritz M. A., 1999, Controls on disturbance regime dynamics: fire in Los Padres National Forest
  36. Mutch R. W., 1997, Environmental regulation & prescribed fire, 8
  37. Reap R. M., 1986, Evaluation of cloud‐to‐ground lightning data from the western United States for the 1983–84 summer seasons., Journal of Climate, 25, 785
  38. Rowe P. B., 1954, Hydrologic analysis used to determine effects of fire on peak discharge and erosion rates in southern California watersheds
  39. Skinner C. N., 1997, Sixth biennial watershed management conference, 15
  40. Talley S. N., 1980, Fire ecology of a montane pine forest, Junipero Sierra Peak, California., Madroño, 27, 49
  41. Weide D. L., 1968, The geography of fire in the Santa Monica Mountains
  42. Wickstrom C. K. R., 1987, Issues concerning Native American use of fire: a literature review. Publications in anthropology 6
  43. Zedler P. H., 1995, Brushfires in California: ecology and resource management, 101
  44. Zedler P. H., 1998, Letters to the editor., Fremontia, 26, 34
  45. Zivnuska J. A., 1950, Wildfire damage and cost far‐reaching., California Agriculture, 4, 8

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 242

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Keeley, J. E., & Fotheringham, C. J.
Affiliations
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
ORCID
Keeley, Jon E.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12-14
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
1536-1548
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
DOI
10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00097.x
OpenAlex
W2067817178
Cited by
242
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 29 d)
Locations
Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • U.S. Forest Service
  • National Institute on Aging
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
fire regimes, chaparral, fire suppression, prescribed burning, catastrophic fire, Santa Ana winds, fire policy, historical fire records, northern Baja California, ecosystem sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review