Cited by 69Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingNursing care and researchAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

Cultural and noncultural predictors of health outcomes in Korean daughter and daughter-in-law caregivers

Kim, Jin‐Sun, Lee, Eun‐Hyun·2003·Public Health Nursing

Abstract

In Western cultures, adverse health effects resulting from providing care for impaired elders is well documented for family caregivers, but little is known about the health of Korean caregivers. This study examined the level of depression and physical health of 120 daughter and daughter-in-law caregivers who cared for cognitively or functionally impaired elderly in Korea. It was hypothesized that cultural factors would have a greater effect on caregivers' health outcomes than noncultural factors, but, contrary to this expectation, the effects of noncultural factors were found to outweigh those of cultural factors. Moreover, the caregivers in this study reported a relatively high level of depression, and more caregivers rated their own health as "poor" than did Western caregivers in previous studies. Family caregiving for the impaired elderly is stressful and negatively affects Korean caregivers' health outcomes regardless of societal values such as filial piety and familism regarding parent care in Korea. Culturally acceptable and sensible support programs may be useful in sustaining long-term care at home by Korean daughter and daughter-in-law caregivers. Further family caregiving studies in the Korean sociocultural context are recommended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1525-1446.2003.20205.x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J., & Lee, E.
Affiliations
  • Chosun University (KR)
  • Ajou University (KR)
Venue
Public Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02-21
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
111-119
ISSN
  • 0737-1209 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1446
OpenAlex
W1974487178
Cited by
69
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • AJOU Open Repository (Ajou University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Chosun University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
family caregivers, caregiver health, depression, physical health, filial piety, familism, cultural factors, cognitive impairment, functional disability, elderly care, caregiver support programs, home care
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cultural Characteristics, Depression, Family Relations, Female, Forecasting, Persons with Disabilities, Health Services Research, Home Nursing, Humans, Korea, Male, Middle Aged, Intergenerational Relations, Caregivers, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Adult Children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review