Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Newly Diagnosed Unprovoked Epileptic Seizures: Presentation at Diagnosis in CAROLE Study

Open access
Jallon, Pierre, Loiseau, Pierre, Loiseau, Jérome, on behalf of Groupe CAROLE (Coordination Active du Réseau Observatoire Longitudinal de l'Epilepsie)·2001·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: Purpose: We describe first unprovoked seizures and newly diagnosed epilepsies at initial presentation, with a special emphasis on epilepsy syndromes, in a large cohort recruited in the mid‐1990s in France. Methods: The French Foundation for Research on Epilepsy set up a network to conduct a prospective study of patients with newly diagnosed unprovoked seizures. Information was provided by 243 child or adult neurologists. Four neurologists classified each case according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) criteria. First‐seizure patients and patients with previously undiagnosed seizures were compared. Results: Between May 1, 1995, and June 30, 1996, 1,942 patients aged from 1 month to 95 years were identified: 926 (47.7%) with a single seizure and 1,016 (52.3%) with newly diagnosed epilepsy. All but 17 patients had EEGs. In the first‐seizure and newly‐diagnosed‐epilepsy groups, neuroimaging studies were performed in 78.2 and 68.3% of patients, and medication prescribed in 54.1 and 89.6%, respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups with respect to age at onset and diagnosis, sex, etiology, several specific syndromes, as well as the type and presentation of initial seizure. In patients for whom the first seizure was convulsive, only sex, multiple seizures in a day or status epilepticus, and cryptogenic localization‐related syndrome differed between the two groups. Conclusions: Approximately half of patients who first came to attention for an unprovoked seizure already met epidemiologic criteria for epilepsy. There were significant differences between the types of patients with a first seizure and those with newly diagnosed epilepsy. One or several seizures at diagnosis did not influence the diagnostic assessment of the patients but had a strong influence on the initiation of treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.31400.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Jallon, P., Loiseau, P., Loiseau, J., & de l'Epilepsie), O. B. O. G. C. (. A. D. R. O. L.
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-04-20
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
464-475
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W2042291251
Cited by
254
References
36
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Newly Diagnosed Unprovoked Epileptic Seizures: Presentation at Diagnosis in CAROLE Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.31400.x
The paper
Jallon, P., Loiseau, P., Loiseau, J., & de l'Epilepsie), O. B. O. G. C. (. A. D. R. O. L. (2001). Newly Diagnosed Unprovoked Epileptic Seizures: Presentation at Diagnosis in CAROLE Study. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.31400.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.