The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Nurse‐Led Interdisciplinary Intervention Program for Delirium in Elderly Hip‐Fracture Patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To develop and test the effect of a nurse‐led interdisciplinary intervention program for delirium on the incidence and course (severity and duration) of delirium, cognitive functioning, functional rehabilitation, mortality, and length of stay in older hip‐fracture patients. DESIGN: Longitudinal prospective before/after design (sequential design). SETTING: The emergency room and two traumatological units of an academic medical center located in an urban area in Belgium. PARTICIPANTS: 60 patients in an intervention cohort (81.7% females, median age = 82, interquartile range (IQR) = 13) and another 60 patients in a usual care/nonintervention cohort (80% females, median age = 80, IQR = 12). INTERVENTION: (1) Education of nursing staff, (2) systematic cognitive screening, (3) consultative services by a delirium resource nurse, a geriatric nurse specialist, or a psychogeriatrician, and (4) use of a scheduled pain protocol. MEASUREMENTS: All patients were monitored for signs of delirium, as measured by the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). Severity of delirium was assessed using a variant of the CAM. Cognitive and functional status were measured by the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) (including subscales of memory, linguistic ability, concentration, and psychomotor executive skills) and the Katz Index of activities of daily living (ADLs), respectively. RESULTS: Although there was no significant effect on the incidence of delirium (23.3% in the control vs 20.0% in the intervention cohort; P = .82), duration of delirium was shorter ( P = .03) and severity of delirium was less ( P = .0049) in the intervention cohort. Further, clinically higher cognitive functioning was observed for the delirious patients in the intervention cohort compared with the nonintervention cohort. Additionally, a trend toward decreased length of stay postoperatively was noted for the delirious patients in the intervention cohort. Despite these positive intervention effects, no effect on ADL rehabilitation was found. Results for risk of mortality were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the beneficial effects of an intervention program focusing on early recognition and treatment of delirium in older hip‐fracture patients and confirms the reversibility of the syndrome in view of the delirium's duration and severity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2022) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787 · Cited by 23,476
The Mini‐Mental State Examination: A Comprehensive Review
Tombaugh, T. N., & McIntyre, N. J. (1992) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01992.x · Cited by 5,152
Inouye, S. K., Viscoli, C. M., Horwitz, R. I., Hurst, L. D., & Tinetti, M. E. (1993) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-119-6-199309150-00005 · Cited by 854
Cited by
Inouye, S. K., Westendorp, R. G., & Saczynski, J. S. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60688-1 · Cited by 3,722
The Confusion Assessment Method: A Systematic Review of Current Usage
Wei, L. A., Fearing, M. A., Sternberg, E. J., & Inouye, S. K. (2008) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01674.x · Cited by 796
Effectiveness of Multicomponent Nonpharmacological Delirium Interventions: A Meta-analysis
Hshieh, T. T., Yue, J., Oh, E., Puelle, M., Dowal, S., Travison, T., & Inouye, S. K. (2015) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7779 · Cited by 801
Morrison, R. S., Magaziner, J., Gilbert, M., Koval, K. J., McLaughlin, M. A., Orosz, G., Strauss, E., & Siu, A. L. (2003) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/58.1.m76 · Cited by 783
Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients
Siddiqi, N., Harrison, J. K., Clegg, A., Teale, E. A., Young, J., Taylor, J., & Simpkins, S. A. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005563.pub3 · Cited by 619
The American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults (2015) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.13281 · Cited by 561
The Importance of Diagnosing and Managing ICU Delirium
Pun, B. T., & Ely, E. W. (2007) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.06-1795 · Cited by 287
Comparative Effectiveness of Pain Management Interventions for Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review
Abou-Setta, A. M., Beaupre, L. A., Rashiq, S., Dryden, D. M., Hamm, M. P., Sadowski, C. A., Menon, M. R. G., Majumdar, S. R., Wilson, D. M., Karkhaneh, M., et al. (2011) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-4-201108160-00346 · Cited by 250
Recruitment of volunteers to improve vitality in the elderly: the REVIVE* study
Caplan, G. A., & Harper, E. L. (2007) · Internal Medicine Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01265.x · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Milisen, K., Foreman, M. D., Abraham, I. L., De Geest, S., Godderis, J., Vandermeulen, E., Fischler, B., Delooz, H. H., Spiessens, B., & Broos, P. L. O.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 523-532
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2124298560
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.