Cited by 47Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasPharmaceutical studies and practicesECG Monitoring and Analysis

QT Correction Methods in Children and Adolescents

WERNICKE, JOACHIM F., FARIES, DOUGLAS, BREITUNG, REBECCA, GIROD, DONALD·2005·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate determination of the QTc interval has become increasingly important in the assessment of a drug's ability to prolong cardiac repolarization. Previous work suggests the most appropriate correction formula for adults is QTc = QT/RR0.40, but little on correction methods for children and adolescents has been published. Methods and Results: In this study, ECG data were obtained from a meta‐analysis of seven clinical trials for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) involving 2,288 children and adolescents. The most appropriate formula for children and adolescents included in this database was found to be QTc = QT/RR0.38. Adjustments of the correction factor specifically for males and females of different ages also are reported. Conclusion: QT correction methods developed for adults do not apply to children. As accurate QTc determination plays a larger role in assessing a drug's potential to retard repolarization, use of age‐ and gender‐specific correction formulas becomes more important.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2005.03520.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Measurement of the QTc interval is not without difficulties, and at least six alternative methods of rate correction are available.

    “Finally, it should be noted that measurement of the QTc interval is not without difficulties, and at least six alternative methods of rate correction are available [83, 149].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WERNICKE, J. F., FARIES, D., BREITUNG, R., & GIROD, D.
Affiliations
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
76-80
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W2131912056
Cited by
47
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
QTc interval, children, adolescents, cardiac repolarization, drug-induced QT prolongation, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ECG
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Child, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Long QT Syndrome, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review