Cited by 12Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

The ratio of the C IV$\lambda\lambda$1548,1550 rest-wavelengths from high-redshift QSO absorption lines

Open access
Petitjean, P., Aracil, B.·2004·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

We report the results of a multiwavelength study of the non-thermal radio emitter HD 168112 (O5.5III(f + )).The detailed analysis of two quasi-simultaneous XMM-Newton and VLA observations reveals strong variability of this star both in the X-ray and radio ranges.The X-ray observations separated by five months reveal a decrease of the X-ray flux of ∼30%.The radio emission on the other hand increases by a factor 5-7 between the two observations obtained roughly simultaneously with the XMM-Newton pointings.The X-ray data reveal a hard emission that is most likely produced by a thermal plasma at kT ∼ 2-3 keV while the VLA data confirm the non-thermal status of this star in the radio waveband.Comparison with archive X-ray and radio data confirms the variability of this source in both wavelength ranges over a yet ill defined time scale.The properties of HD 168112 in the X-ray and radio domain point towards a binary system with a significant eccentricity and an orbital period of a few years.However, our optical spectra reveal no significant changes of the star's radial velocity suggesting that if HD 168112 is indeed a binary, it must be seen under a fairly low inclination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361:20041030

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This result is less constraining than the two previous analyses, mainly because the q-coefficients are smaller for C IV.

    “This is less constraining than the two previous analyses, mainly because the q-coefficients are smaller for C IV (see Petitjean and Aracil 2004 for the calibration of the laboratory spectra).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petitjean, P., & Aracil, B.
Affiliations
  • Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris (FR)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2004-08
Volume
422
Issue
2
Pages
523-526
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W1737888242
Cited by
12
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • National Radio Astronomy Observatory
  • Associated Universities
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
  • European Southern Observatory
  • Services Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et Culturelles
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
non-thermal radio emission, X-ray variability, radio variability, binary stars, eccentric orbits, orbital period, radial velocity, thermal plasma, X-ray emission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review