Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Herschel PEP/HerMES: the redshift evolution (0 ≤z≤ 4) of dust attenuation and of the total (UV+IR) star formation rate density

Open access
Burgarella, D., Buat, V., Gruppioni, C., Cucciati, O., Heinis, S., Berta, S., Béthermin, M., Bock, J., Cooray, A., Dunlop, J. S., Farrah, D., Franceschini, A., Le Floc’h, E., Lutz, D., Magnelli, B., Nordon, R., Oliver, S. J., Page, M. J., Popesso, P., Pozzi, F., Riguccini, L., Vaccari, M., Viero, M.·2013·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

Using new homogeneous luminosity functions (LFs) in the far-ultraviolet (FUV) from VVDS and in the far-infrared (FIR) from Herschel/PEP and Herschel/HerMES, we studied the evolution of the dust attenuation with redshift. With this information, we were able to estimate the redshift evolution of the total (FUV + FIR) star formation rate density (SFRDTOT). By integrating SFRDTOT, we followed the mass building and analyzed the redshift evolution of the stellar mass density (SMD). This article aims at providing a complete view of star formation from the local Universe to z ~ 4 and, using assumptions on earlier star formation history, compares this evolution with previously published data in an attempt to draw a homogeneous picture of the global evolution of star formation in galaxies. Our main conclusions are that: 1) the dust attenuation AFUV is found to increase from z = 0 to z ~ 1.2 and then starts to decrease until our last data point at z = 3.6; 2) the estimated SFRD confirms published results to z ~ 2. At z > 2, we observe either a plateau or a small increase up to z ~ 3 and then a likely decrease up to z = 3.6; 3) the peak of AFUV is delayed with respect to the plateau of SFRDTOT and a probable origin might be found in the evolution of the bright ends of the FUV and FIR LFs; 4) using assumptions (exponential rise and linear rise with time) for the evolution of the star formation density from z = 3.6 to zform = 10, we integrated SFRDTOT and obtained a good agreement with the published SMDs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/201321651

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Burgarella, D., Buat, V., Gruppioni, C., Cucciati, O., Heinis, S., Berta, S., Béthermin, M., Bock, J., Cooray, A., Dunlop, J. S., Farrah, D., Franceschini, A., Le Floc’h, E., Lutz, D., Magnelli, B., Nordon, R., Oliver, S. J., Page, M. J., Popesso, P., Pozzi, F., Riguccini, L., Vaccari, M., & Viero, M.
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2013-06
Volume
554
Pages
A70
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W1656152305
Cited by
192
References
1
FWCI
13.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Herschel PEP/HerMES: the redshift evolution (0 ≤z≤ 4) of dust attenuation and of the total (UV+IR) star formation rate density. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361/201321651
The paper
Burgarella, D., Buat, V., Gruppioni, C., Cucciati, O., Heinis, S., Berta, S., Béthermin, M., Bock, J., Cooray, A., Dunlop, J. S., Farrah, D., Franceschini, A., Le Floc’h, E., Lutz, D., Magnelli, B., Nordon, R., Oliver, S. J., Page, M. J., Popesso, P., . . . Viero, M. (2013). Herschel PEP/HerMES: the redshift evolution (0 ≤z≤ 4) of dust attenuation and of the total (UV+IR) star formation rate density. Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321651

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.