The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New models for the evolution of post-asymptotic giant branch stars and central stars of planetary nebulae
Open accessAbstract
Context. The post-asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase is arguably one of the least understood phases of the evolution of low- and intermediate- mass stars. The two grids of models presently available are based on outdated micro- and macrophysics and do not agree with each other. Studies of the central stars of planetary nebulae (CSPNe) and post-AGB stars in different stellar populations point to significant discrepancies with the theoretical predictions of post-AGB models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Chemical Composition of the Sun
Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. (2009) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 · Cited by 9,346
Iglesias, C. A., & Rogers, F. J. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177381 · Cited by 3,020
A compilation of charged-particle induced thermonuclear reaction rates
Angulo, C., Arnould, M., Rayet, M., Descouvemont, P., Baye, D., Leclercq-Willain, C., Coc, A., Barhoumi, S., Aguer, P., Rolfs, C., et al. (1999) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(99)00030-5 · Cited by 2,265
Stellar Structure and Evolution
Kippenhahn, R., Weigert, A., & Weiss, A. (2012) · Astronomy and Astrophysics Library · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30304-3 · Cited by 1,989
Mass-loss predictions for O and B stars as a function of metallicity
Vink, J. S., de Koter, A., & Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. (2001) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010127 · Cited by 1,727
The Dartmouth Stellar Evolution Database
Dotter, A., Chaboyer, B., Jevremović, D., Kostov, V., Baron, E., & Ferguson, J. W. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/589654 · Cited by 1,717
Grids of stellar models with rotation: I. Models from 0.8 to 120 M⊙at solar metallicity (Z= 0.014)⋆
Ekström, S., Georgy, C., Eggenberger, P., Meynet, G., Mowlavi, N., Wyttenbach, A., Granada, A., Decressin, T., Hirschi, R., Frischknecht, U., et al. (2012) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117751 · Cited by 1,712
Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., & Castelli, F. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/422498 · Cited by 1,418
Ferguson, J. W., Alexander, D. R., Allard, F., Barman, T., Bodnarik, J. G., Hauschildt, P. H., Heffner‐Wong, A., & Tamanai, A. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/428642 · Cited by 1,327
Vassiliadis, E., & Wood, P. R. (1993) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/173033 · Cited by 1,253
Cited by
MESA ISOCHRONES AND STELLAR TRACKS (MIST). I. SOLAR-SCALED MODELS
Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., Cantiello, M., Paxton, B., & Johnson, B. D. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/102 · Cited by 2,922
STELLAR YIELDS FROM METAL-RICH ASYMPTOTIC GIANT BRANCH MODELS
Karakas, A. I., & Lugaro, M. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/825/1/26 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller Bertolami, M. M.
- Venue
- Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2016-03-15
- Volume
- 588
- Pages
- A25
- ISSN
- 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0746
- OpenAlex
- W2951599074
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 18.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New models for the evolution of post-asymptotic giant branch stars and central stars of planetary nebulae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361/201526577
- The paper
- Miller Bertolami, M. M. (2016). New models for the evolution of post-asymptotic giant branch stars and central stars of planetary nebulae. Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526577
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
