CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 48Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchAstro and Planetary Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Search for giant planets in M 67: IV. Survey results⋆⋆⋆

Open access
Brucalassi, A., Koppenhoefer, J., Saglia, R., Pasquini, L., Ruiz, M. T., Bonifacio, P., Bedin, L. R., Libralato, M., Biazzo, K., Melo, C., Lovis, C., Randich, S.·2017·Astronomy & Astrophysics
DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/201527562
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Context. We present the results of a seven-year-long radial velocity survey of a sample of 88 main-sequence and evolved stars to reveal signatures of Jupiter-mass planets in the solar-age and solar-metallicity open cluster M 67.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/201527562

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brucalassi et al. (2017) find the occurrence rate for hot Jupiters in the solar-metallicity, solar-age open cluster M67 is higher than in the field, though the discrepancy is only marginally statistically significant.

    “Brucalassi et al. (2017) find the occurrence rate for hot Jupiters in the solar-metallicity, solar-age open cluster M67 is actually higher than in the field (though the discrepancy is only marginally statistically significant).”

    From Origins of Hot Jupiters (2018) · cites this paper as Brucalassi et al. (2017)

    The Introduction describes M67 as having nearly solar chemical composition and an age of 3–5 Gyr. The Summary and conclusion reports a hot-Jupiter occurrence rate of about 5.7% among the survey’s main-sequence stars, higher than in field stars. The paper gives substantial uncertainty and calls for more detections, but the passages do not establish that the difference is statistically significant, even marginally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. Baranne, 1996, A&AS, 119, 373, 10.1051/aas:1996251 · DOI
  2. Baumann, 2010, A&A, 519, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015137 · DOI
  3. Brucalassi, 2014, A&A, 561, L9, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322584 · DOI
  4. Brucalassi, 2016, A&A, 592, L1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527561 · DOI
  5. Cai, 2016, IAU Symp., 312, 235
  6. Cappetta, 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1877, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21937.x · DOI
  7. Cumming, 2004, MNRAS, 354, 1165, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08275.x · DOI
  8. Cumming, 2008, PASP, 120, 531, 10.1086/588487 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dawson, 2013, ApJ, 767, L24, 10.1088/2041-8205/767/2/L24 · DOI
  10. Deal, 2015, A&A, 584, A105, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526917 · DOI
  11. Dong, 2014, ApJ, 781, L5, 10.1088/2041-8205/781/1/L5 · DOI
  12. Dupree, 1999, ApJ, 520, 751, 10.1086/307504 · DOI
  13. Gehrels, 1986, ApJ, 303, 336, 10.1086/164079 · DOI
  14. Geller, 2015, AJ, 150, 97, 10.1088/0004-6256/150/3/97 · DOI
  15. Giampapa, 2006, ApJ, 651, 444, 10.1086/507624 · DOI
  16. Gilliland, 2000, ApJ, 545, L47, 10.1086/317334 · DOI
  17. Girardi, 2000, A&AS, 141, 371, 10.1051/aas:2000126 · DOI
  18. González Hernández, 2010, ApJ, 720, 1592, 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1592 · DOI
  19. González Hernández, J. I., Delgado-Mena, E., Sousa, S. G., et al. 2013, in New Quests in Stellar Astrophysics III: A Panchromatic View of Solar-Like Stars, With and Without Planets, eds. M. Chavez, E. Bertone, O. Vega, & V. De la Luz, ASP Conf. Ser., 472, 97
  20. Hekker, 2008, A&A, 480, 215, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078321 · DOI
  21. Horne, 1986, ApJ, 302, 757, 10.1086/164037 · DOI
  22. Howard, 2011, ApJ, 730, 10, 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/10 · DOI
  23. Jacobson, 2011, AJ, 142, 59, 10.1088/0004-6256/142/2/59 · DOI
  24. Johnson, 2010, PASP, 122, 905, 10.1086/655775 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Lagrange, 2009, A&A, 495, 335, 10.1051/0004-6361:200810105 · DOI
  26. Lee, 2008, AJ, 136, 2050, 10.1088/0004-6256/136/5/2050 · DOI
  27. Li, 2015, MNRAS, 448, 344, 10.1093/mnras/stv012 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Lovis, 2007, A&A, 472, 657, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077375 · DOI
  29. Malavolta, 2016, A&A, 588, A118, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527933 · DOI
  30. Malmberg, 2011, MNRAS, 411, 859, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17730.x · DOI
  31. Mathieu, 1986, AJ, 92, 1100, 10.1086/114240 · DOI
  32. Mayor, 2003, The Messenger, 114, 20
  33. Mayor, M., Marmier, M., Lovis, C., et al. 2011, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1109.2497] · arXiv
  34. Meibom, 2013, Nature, 499, 55, 10.1038/nature12279 · DOI
  35. Meléndez, 2009, ApJ, 704, L66, 10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/L66 · DOI
  36. Melo, 2001, A&A, 375, 851, 10.1051/0004-6361:20010897 · DOI
  37. Mermilliod, 2007, A&A, 470, 919, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077198 · DOI
  38. Montgomery, 1993, AJ, 106, 181, 10.1086/116628 · DOI
  39. Mortier, 2012, A&A, 543, A45, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118651 · DOI
  40. Naef, D., Mayor, M., Beuzit, J.-L., et al. 2005, in 13th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems and the Sun, eds. F. Favata, G. A. J. Hussain, & B. Battrick, ESA SP, 560, 833
  41. Narayan, 2005, ApJ, 620, 1002, 10.1086/426380 · DOI
  42. Nascimbeni, 2012, A&A, 541, A144, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118655 · DOI
  43. Önehag, 2011, A&A, 528, A85, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015138 · DOI
  44. Önehag, 2014, A&A, 562, A102, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322663 · DOI
  45. Pace, 2004, A&A, 426, 1021, 10.1051/0004-6361:20040568 · DOI
  46. Pace, 2008, A&A, 489, 403, 10.1051/0004-6361:200809969 · DOI
  47. Pace, 2012, A&A, 541, A150, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117704 · DOI
  48. Pasquini, 1991, A&A, 251, 199
  49. Pasquini, 2008, A&A, 489, 677, 10.1051/0004-6361:200809714 · DOI
  50. Pasquini, 2012, A&A, 545, A139, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219169 · DOI
  51. Pepe, 2002, A&A, 388, 632, 10.1051/0004-6361:20020433 · DOI
  52. Perruchot, S., Bouchy, F., et al. 2011, in SPIE Conf. Ser., 8151 · DOI
  53. Pietrinferni, 2004, ApJ, 612, 168, 10.1086/422498 · DOI
  54. Quinn, 2014, ApJ, 787, 27, 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/27 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Ramírez, 2010, A&A, 521, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014456 · DOI
  56. Randich, 2006, A&A, 450, 557, 10.1051/0004-6361:20054291 · DOI
  57. Reiners, 2009, ApJ, 707, 852, 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/852 · DOI
  58. Sanders, 1977, A&AS, 27, 89
  59. Santerne, 2012, A&A, 545, A76, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219608 · DOI
  60. Santos, 2010, A&A, 511, A54, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913433 · DOI
  61. Sato, 2007, ApJ, 661, 527, 10.1086/513503 · DOI
  62. Scargle, 1982, ApJ, 263, 835, 10.1086/160554 · DOI
  63. Setiawan, 2004, A&A, 421, 241, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041042-1 · DOI
  64. Shara, 2016, ApJ, 816, 59, 10.3847/0004-637X/816/2/59 · DOI
  65. Smolinski, 2011, AJ, 141, 89, 10.1088/0004-6256/141/3/89 · DOI
  66. Sozzetti, 2009, ApJ, 697, 544, 10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/544 · DOI
  67. Spurzem, 2009, ApJ, 697, 458, 10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/458 · DOI
  68. Tull, 1998, BAAS, 30, 1263
  69. Wright, 2009, ApJS, 182, 205, 10.1088/0067-0049/182/1/205 · DOI
  70. Wu, 2011, RA&A, 11, 924
  71. Yadav, 2008, A&A, 484, 609, 10.1051/0004-6361:20079245 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brucalassi, A., Koppenhoefer, J., Saglia, R., Pasquini, L., Ruiz, M. T., Bonifacio, P., Bedin, L. R., Libralato, M., Biazzo, K., Melo, C., Lovis, C., & Randich, S.
Affiliations
  • European Southern Observatory (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova (IT)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania (IT)
  • Arcetri Astrophysical Observatory (IT)
ORCID
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2017-07
Volume
603
Pages
A85
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
DOI
10.1051/0004-6361/201527562
OpenAlex
W2598185346
Cited by
48
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (PFB-06)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
Keywords
M67, giant planets, radial velocity surveys, open clusters, Jupiter-mass planets, exoplanet detection, main-sequence stars, evolved stars, solar metallicity, solar age

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review