Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,024

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gaia Early Data Release 3: Parallax bias versus magnitude, colour, and position

Open access
Lindegren, L., Bastian, U., Biermann, M., Bombrun, A., de Torres, A., Gerlach, E., Geyer, R., Hernández, J., Hilger, T., Hobbs, D., Klioner, S. A., Lammers, U., McMillan, P. J., Ramos-Lerate, M., Steidelmüller, H., Stephenson, C. A., van Leeuwen, F.·2021·Astronomy & Astrophysics

Abstract

Context. Gaia Early Data Release 3 (Gaia EDR3) gives trigonometric parallaxes for nearly 1.5 billion sources. Inspection of the EDR3 data for sources identified as quasars reveals that their parallaxes are biased, that is, they are systematically offset from the expected distribution around zero, by a few tens of microarcseconds. Aims.We attempt to map the main dependences of the parallax bias in EDR3. In principle, this could provide a recipe for correcting the EDR3 parallaxes. Methods.Quasars provide the most direct way for estimating the parallax bias for faint sources. In order to extend this to brighter sources and a broader range of colours, we used differential methods based on physical pairs (binaries) and sources in the Large Magellanic Cloud. The functional forms of the dependences were explored by mapping the systematic differences between EDR3 and DR2 parallaxes. Results.The parallax bias is found to depend in a non-trivial way on (at least) the magnitude, colour, and ecliptic latitude of the source. Different dependences apply to the five- and six-parameter solutions in EDR3. While it is not possible to derive a definitive recipe for the parallax correction, we give tentative expressions to be used at the researcher’s discretion and point out some possible paths towards future improvements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/0004-6361/202039653

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 1,024

Metadata

Authors
Lindegren, L., Bastian, U., Biermann, M., Bombrun, A., de Torres, A., Gerlach, E., Geyer, R., Hernández, J., Hilger, T., Hobbs, D., Klioner, S. A., Lammers, U., McMillan, P. J., Ramos-Lerate, M., Steidelmüller, H., Stephenson, C. A., & van Leeuwen, F.
Venue
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2021-04-28
Volume
649
Pages
A4
ISSN
  • 0004-6361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0746
OpenAlex
W3114792974
Cited by
1,024
References
3
FWCI
61.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gaia Early Data Release 3: Parallax bias versus magnitude, colour, and position. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/0004-6361/202039653
The paper
Lindegren, L., Bastian, U., Biermann, M., Bombrun, A., de Torres, A., Gerlach, E., Geyer, R., Hernández, J., Hilger, T., Hobbs, D., Klioner, S. A., Lammers, U., McMillan, P. J., Ramos-Lerate, M., Steidelmüller, H., Stephenson, C. A., & van Leeuwen, F. (2021). Gaia Early Data Release 3: Parallax bias versus magnitude, colour, and position. Astronomy & Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039653

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.