Cited by 49Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

Spectrophotometric Parallaxes with Linear Models: Accurate Distances for Luminous Red-giant Stars

Open access
Hogg, David W., Eilers, Anna-Christina, Rix, Hans-Walter·2019·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

With contemporary infrared spectroscopic surveys like APO Galactic Evolution Experiment ( APOGEE ), red-giant stars can be observed to distances and extinctions at which Gaia parallaxes are not highly informative. Yet the combination of effective temperature, surface gravity, composition, and age—all accessible through spectroscopy—determines a giant’s luminosity. Therefore spectroscopy plus photometry should enable precise spectrophotometric distance estimates. Here we use the overlap of APOGEE, Gaia , the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS), the and Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer ( WISE ) to train a data-driven model to predict parallaxes for red-giant branch stars with (more luminous than the red clump). We employ (the exponentiation of) a linear function of APOGEE spectral pixel intensities and multiband photometry to predict parallax spectrophotometrically. The model training involves no logarithms or inverses of the Gaia parallaxes, and needs no cut on the Gaia parallax signal-to-noise ratio. It includes an L1 regularization to zero out the contributions of uninformative pixels. The training is performed with leave-out subsamples such that no star’s astrometry is used even indirectly in its spectrophotometric parallax estimate. The model implicitly performs a reddening and extinction correction in its parallax prediction, without any explicit dust model. We assign to each star in the sample a new spectrophotometric parallax estimate; these parallaxes have uncertainties of less than 15%, depending on data quality, which is more precise than the Gaia parallax for the vast majority of targets, and certainly any stars more than a few kiloparsec distance. We obtain 10% distance estimates out to heliocentric distances of 20 kpc, and make global maps of the Milky Way’s disk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-3881/ab398c

Cites

34 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The stellar positions and velocities come from a compilation of Gaia DR2 measurements, combined with improved parallax determinations from APOGEE DR14 spectra and photometric information from WISE, 2MASS and Gaia.

    “The stellar positions and velocities come from a compilation of Gaia DR2 measurements, combined with improved parallax determinations from APOGEE DR14 spectra and photometric information from WISE, 2MASS and Gaia (for details see Hogg et al. 2019).”

    From The milky way total mass profile as inferred from Gaia DR2 (2020) · cites this paper as Hogg et al. 2019

    Section 4 (Data; page unavailable) confirms that the parallax estimates use APOGEE DR14 spectra and photometry from WISE, 2MASS, and Gaia DR2. Section 5 (Results and Validation; page unavailable) says the resulting parallax catalog can be joined to Gaia astrometry and, separately, to APOGEE radial velocities. It does not support the claim that the stellar velocities as a whole come from Gaia DR2 measurements. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mora, A., González-Núñez, J., Baines, D., et al. 2018, in IAU Symp. 330, Astrometry and Astrophysics in the Gaia Sky, ed. A. Recio-Blanco, P. de Laverny, A. G. A. Brown, & T. Prusti (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 35

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hogg, D. W., Eilers, A.-C., & Rix, H.-W.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2019-09-16
Volume
158
Issue
4
Pages
147
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2896289061
Cited by
48
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Yale University
  • Carnegie Institution of Washington
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Ohio State University
  • California Institute of Technology
  • University of Washington
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Carnegie Mellon University
  • University of Notre Dame
  • University of Portsmouth
  • New Mexico State University
  • European Space Agency
  • Flatiron Health
  • York University
  • University of Oxford
  • Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie
  • Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias
  • Office of Science
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
red giant branch stars, stellar distances, APOGEE, Gaia parallaxes, linear models, L1 regularization, extinction correction, reddening, multi-band photometry, stellar luminosity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review