The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Image subtraction using a space-varying kernel
Open accessAbstract
Image subtraction is a method by which one image is matched against another by using a convolution kernel, so that they can be differenced to detect and measure variable objects. It has been demonstrated that constant optimal-kernel solutions can be derived over small sub-areas of dense stellar fields. Here we generalize the theory to the case of space-varying kernels. In particular, it is shown that the CPU cost required for this new extension of the method is almost the same as for fitting a constant kernel solution. It is also shown that constant flux scaling between the images (constant kernel integral) can be imposed in a simple way. The method is demonstrated with a series of Monte-Carlo images. Differential PSF variations and differential rotation between the images are simulated. It is shown that the new method is able to achieve optimal results even in these difficult cases, thereby automatically correcting for these common instrumental problems. It is also demonstrated that the method does not suffer due to problems associated with under-sampling of the images. Finally, the method is applied to images taken by the OGLE II collaboration. It is proved that, in comparison to the constant-kernel method, much larger sub-areas of the images can be used for the fit, while still maintaining the same accuracy in the subtracted image. This result is especially important in case of variables located in low density fields, like the Huchra lens. Many other useful applications of the method are possible for major astrophysical problems; Supernova searches and Cepheids surveys in other galaxies, to mention but two. Many other applications will certainly show-up, since variability searches are a major issue in astronomy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Discovery of a cool planet of 5.5 Earth masses through gravitational microlensing
Beaulieu, J.-P., Bennett, D. P., Fouqué, P., Williams, A., Dominik, M., Jørgensen, U. G., Kubas, D., Cassan, A., Coutures, C., Greenhill, J., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04441 · Cited by 594
Microlensing constraints on primordial black holes with Subaru/HSC Andromeda observations
Niikura, H., Takada, M., Yasuda, N., Lupton, R. H., Sumi, T., More, S., Kurita, T., Sugiyama, S., More, A., Oguri, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0723-1 · Cited by 570
AN r -PROCESS KILONOVA ASSOCIATED WITH THE SHORT-HARD GRB 130603B
Berger, E., Fong, W., & Chornock, R. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/774/2/l23 · Cited by 486
Microlens OGLE-2005-BLG-169 Implies That Cool Neptune-like Planets Are Common
Gould, A., Udalski, A., An, D., Bennett, D. P., Zhou, A.-Y., Dong, S., Rattenbury, N. J., Gaudi, B. S., Yock, P. C. M., Bond, I. A., et al. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/505421 · Cited by 323
PROPER IMAGE SUBTRACTION—OPTIMAL TRANSIENT DETECTION, PHOTOMETRY, AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING
Zackay, B., Ofek, E. O., & Gal-Yam, A. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/830/1/27 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Alard, C.
- Venue
- Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 363-370
- ISSN
- 0365-0138 (ISSN-L)
- 1286-4846
- OpenAlex
- W2023016496
- Cited by
- 838
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 50.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Image subtraction using a space-varying kernel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/aas:2000214
- The paper
- Alard, C. (2000). Image subtraction using a space-varying kernel. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1051/aas%3A2000214
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.