Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityInsect Pest Control StrategiesEdible Oils Quality and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 29 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Characterization of Commercial Bulgarian Dill ( Anethum graveolens L.) Fruit Essential Oil

Open access

Abstract

Dill ( Anethum graveolens L.) fruit is an important raw material in the food industry due to its aromatic properties and its role as a source of essential oil. The present study examines the composition and biological properties of a commercially available dill fruit essential oil produced in Bulgaria, with emphasis on its potential application in food systems. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis identified eleven constituents representing 99.93% of the total oil content. The profile was dominated by carvone (45.91%), followed by limonene (26.56%), α-phellandrene (16.64%), and dill ether (4.38%). The antimicrobial potential of the oil was evaluated against selected Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. A concentration-dependent inhibitory effect was observed for Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica , with maximum inhibition zones of 35 mm and 23 mm, respectively, at the highest tested concentration (0.10 mL). In contrast, no activity was detected against Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus . Antioxidant capacity was assessed using DPPH and FRAP assays, yielding values of 485 ± 0.04 µM TE/mL and 787.24 ± 0.05 µM TE/mL, respectively. These results indicate strong reducing ability and radical scavenging potential. Overall, the investigated dill essential oil demonstrates a well-defined chemical profile and notable biological activity, suggesting its suitability as a natural ingredient for enhancing food quality, stability, and safety.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This study characterizes a commercial Bulgarian dill fruit essential oil, finding a carvone/limonene-rich profile with selective antibacterial activity against *Escherichia coli* and *Salmonella enterica* and measurable antioxidant capacity. The authors suggest it may be useful as a natural food ingredient for oxidative stability and microbial control.

Key findings

  • GC-MS identified 11 constituents representing 99.93% of the oil; major compounds were carvone (45.91%), limonene (26.56%), α-phellandrene (16.64%), and dill ether (4.38%).
  • Antimicrobial testing showed concentration-dependent inhibition of *E. coli* and *S. enterica*, with maximum inhibition zones of 35 mm and 23 mm, respectively, at 0.10 mL; no activity was detected against *Listeria monocytogenes* or *Staphylococcus aureus*.
  • Antioxidant capacity was 485 ± 0.04 µM TE/mL by DPPH and 787.24 ± 0.05 µM TE/mL by FRAP, with the FRAP value significantly higher (p < 0.05).
  • Major chemical groups were oxygenated monoterpenes (53.89%) and monoterpene hydrocarbons (45.57%).

Methods

  • A commercially available Bulgarian dill fruit essential oil from fruits harvested in 2024 was analyzed without further modification.
  • Chemical composition was determined by GC-MS (Agilent system, HP-5ms column, helium carrier gas), with compounds identified by retention indices using n-alkane standards and quantified by normalized peak areas.
  • Antimicrobial activity was assessed by agar diffusion against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria; antioxidant activity used DPPH and FRAP assays. All analyses were performed in triplicate, with results expressed as mean ± SD and evaluated by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test (p < 0.05) in SPSS v.19.0.

Limitations

  • The paper does not include an explicit limitations section.
  • Evident from the text: the study examines only one commercial oil sample from a single harvest year, so cultivar, harvest timing, and environmental variability are not experimentally addressed.
  • Evident from the text: antimicrobial testing covers only four bacterial strains and reports inhibition zones rather than MIC values; no positive controls or food-matrix application trials are described.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/bioconf/202623601012

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Fig. 1 Chromatogram of the essential oil. (The peak numbers correspond to those listed in the table.)
Fig. 1 Chromatogram of the essential oil. (The peak numbers correspond to those listed in the table.)CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 Distribution of components by chemical group (%): 1 - monoterpene hydrocarbons; 2 - oxygenated monoterpenes; 3 - aromatic hydrocarbons.
Fig. 2 Distribution of components by chemical group (%): 1 - monoterpene hydrocarbons; 2 - oxygenated monoterpenes; 3 - aromatic hydrocarbons.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Distribution of oxygenated compounds, %: 1 - ketones; 2 - ethers.
Fig. 3 Distribution of oxygenated compounds, %: 1 - ketones; 2 - ethers.CC-BY · From the PDF
Тable 3 . Inhibition zones of dill fruit essential oil - images
Тable 3 . Inhibition zones of dill fruit essential oil - imagesCC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

16 Own interpretation · 13 Own result · 6 Not checked yet · 4 Sources not found · 1 Check pending · 1 No full text of the sources · 1 Own method

11 more claims

Create a free account to see all 42 claims and to verify the 11 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 20
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 13

Create a free account to see these claims.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Baeva, 2013, J. Food Packag. Sci. Technol. Technol., 2, 129
  2. Radulescu, 2010, Farmacia, 58, 594
  3. Dimov, 2019, Bulg. Chem. Commun., 51, 214
  4. Vokk, 2011, Agron. Res., 9, 515
  5. Babri, 2012, Sci. Int. (Lahore), 24, 453
  6. Altameme, 2017, Int. J. Pharm. Qual. Assur., 8, 88
  7. Mahmoodi, 2012, Glob. Veterinaria, 9, 73
  8. Chahal, 2017, J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 6, 295
  9. Leahu, 2013, Food Environ. Safety, 12, 347
  10. Rathore, 2013, Int. J. Seed Spices, 3, 12
  11. Ayoughi, 2009, J. Med. Plants, 8, 71
  12. Ortan, 2009, Rom. Biotechnol. Lett., 14, 4342
  13. Kostova, 2014, Ukr. Food J., 3, 516
  14. Kostova, 2017, Sci. Works Univ. Rousse, 56, 111

Cited by

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Fidan, H., Dervish, D., Dincheva, I., & Kolev, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Food Technologies (BG)
  • Agrobioinstitute (BG)
  • Trakia University (BG)
Venue
BIO Web of Conferences
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2026
Volume
236
Pages
01012
ISSN
2117-4458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7162296434
Cited by
1
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
18.10
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BIO Web of Conferences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Keywords
dill, essential oil composition, carvone, limonene, α-phellandrene, antimicrobial activity, Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, antioxidant capacity, natural food preservatives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-12, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-12 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.