The DOI matches its Crossref record.
I. Parity violation induced by weak neutral currents in atomic physics
Open accessAbstract
In this paper (the first of a series), we present a general analysis of the parity violating phenomena induced by neutral currents in Atomic Physics. We first give expressions for the short range parity violating electron-nucleus and electron-electron potentials predicted by the theoretical schemes of weak interactions featuring neutral currents. We turn next to a detailed computation of the matrix element, between one-particle s and p states, of the electron-nucleus parity violating potential. Using a non-trivial extension of a method used by Foldy to put on a more rigorous basis a formula of Fermi and Segre giving the wave function of an s valence electron at the nucleus, we arrive at a remarkably simple expression, in terms of the binding energies, with a small correcting term involving the interpolated quantum defect and the potential of the electronic cloud at the origin. Arguments are given which lead us to believe that the accuracy of our formula is comparable to that of the Fermi-Segre formula, i. e. a few per cent when Z >> 1. Besides its simplicity, a remarkable feature of our result is a Z3 dependence, which obviously favours heavy atoms. We give a brief analysis of the manifestation of parity mixing in atomic radiative transitions, with a particular emphasis on the implications of time reversal invariance, which is preserved by the interactions discussed in this paper. In order to improve the existing limits, we suggest looking for parity violating effects in twice forbidden magnetic dipole transitions induced by a tunable laser beam in heavy atoms. In a typical case, like the 6 S1/2 → 7 S1/2 transition in atomic Cesium, a circular dichroism of the order of 10-4 is predicted. Finally we discuss the apparently more remote possibilities offered by the muonic atoms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How Important is Parity Violation for Molecular and Biomolecular Chirality?
Quack, M. (2002) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200290005 · Cited by 441
Orbital electron capture by the nucleus
Bambynek, W., Behrens, H., Chen, M. H., Crasemann, B., Fitzpatrick, M. L., Ledingham, K. W. D., Genz, H., Mutterer, M., & Intemann, R. L. (1977) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.49.77 · Cited by 441
Bouchiat, M.-A., & Bouchiat, C. (1997) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/60/11/004 · Cited by 272
Self-citationAb initio calculation of molecular energies including parity violating interactions
Bakasov, A., Ha, T.-K., & Quack, M. (1998) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.477360 · Cited by 170
Crassous, J., Chardonnet, C., Saue, T., & Schwerdtfeger, P. (2005) · Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b504212g · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouchiat, M. A., & Bouchiat, C.
- Venue
- Journal de Physique
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 1974
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 899-927
- ISSN
- 0302-0738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153993178
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: I. Parity violation induced by weak neutral currents in atomic physics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1051/jphys:019740035012089900
- The paper
- Bouchiat, M. A., & Bouchiat, C. (1974). I. Parity violation induced by weak neutral currents in atomic physics. Journal de Physique. https://doi.org/10.1051/jphys%3A019740035012089900
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.