Cited by 10Nuclear reactor physics and engineeringNuclear physics research studiesNuclear Physics and Applications

New working methods for nuclear data evaluation: how to make a nuclear data library?

Open access
Koning, A. J.·2007·ND2007

Abstract

A call for more modern nuclear data evaluation methodology is made.As an example of the current computational possibilities, nuclear model generated covariances are presented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/ndata:07683

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. A.J. Koning, S. Hilaire, M.C. Duijvestijn, TALYS-1.0 (these proceedings).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koning, A. J.
Affiliations
Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group (NL)
Corresponding author
Koning, A. J.
Venue
ND2007
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2007
OpenAlex
W2108125516
Cited by
10
References
6
Citations by year
2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Nuclear Physics and Applications
Keywords
nuclear data evaluation, nuclear data libraries, covariance data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review