Cited by 14Radioactive contamination and transferNuclear and radioactivity studiesEffects of Radiation Exposure

Applying process-based models to the Borssele scenario

Open access
Brown, J.E., Beresford, N.A., Hosseini, A., Barnett, C.L.·2020·Radioprotection

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to consider the implications of employing process-based models on predictions for radionuclide activity concentrations in grass and cow milk. The FDMT (Food Chain and Dose Module for Terrestrial Pathways as used in the JRODOS and ARGOS decision support systems) model has been transferred to a modelling platform enabling sub-models to be modified and replaced. Primarily, this has involved invoking process-based models for 137 Cs and 90 Sr that account for soil chemistry in simulating bioavailability and plant transfer. The implementation of such models can lead to quite dramatic differences in predicted activity concentrations of radionuclides in grass and milk compared to a default FDMT set-up for time periods later than a few weeks post deposition. Considering transfer within a spatial context, by combining information from the outputs of process-based models with illustrative soil maps, leads to the observation that the most elevated 137 Cs and 90 Sr concentrations in grass and milk might not necessarily occur in areas where deposition is highest. Not accounting for soil type when modelling food chain transfer might lead to the sub-optimal allocation of resources or misidentification of the most vulnerable areas in the long-term after an accidental release.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/radiopro/2020020

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Visualization methods of radioecological data in DSS during different phases of a radiation accident significantly influence the quality of experts' countermeasure decisions.

    “Потрібно відзначити, що способи візуалізації радіоекологічних даних у СППР протягом різних фаз радіаційної аварії мають суттєвий вплив на якість прийняття експертами контрзаходів щодо захисту населення та радіоактивно забруднених територій [20].”

    From https://npe.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/28-6.pdf (2023) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Conclusions state that combining soil-type maps with process-based models helps identify where longer-term contamination remains and where countermeasures may best be employed. Section 3.3 adds that failing to account for soil type might misallocate resources. The paper does not assess whether visualization methods in decision support systems significantly affect experts’ decision quality across different phases of an accident. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Absalom JP, Young SD, Crout NMJ, Sanchez A, Wright SM, Smolders E, Nisbet AF, Gillett AG. 2001. Predicting the transfer of radiocaesium from organic soils to plants using soil characte- ristics. J. Environ. Radioact. 52: 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0265-931X(00)00098-9. · DOI
  2. Avila R, Broed R, Pereira A. 2005. ECOLEGO -A toolbox for radioecological risk assessment. In: Proceedings of the Interna- tional Conference on the Protection from the Effects of Ionizing Radiation. IAEA-CN-109/80. pp. 229-232. Stockholm: Interna- tional Atomic Energy Agency.
  3. Howard BJ, Strand P, Assimakopoulos P, Bréchignac F, Gascó C, Métivier H, Moberg L, Smith JT, Tamponnet C, Trueba C, Voigt G, Wright S. 2002. Estimation of radioecological sensitivity. Radioprotection 37: 1167-1173. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/ 2002142. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Müller H, Pröhl G. 1993. ECOSYS-87: A dynamic model for assessing radiological consequences of nuclear accidents. Health Phys. 64: 232-252. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199303000-00002. · DOI
  5. Tarsitano D, Young SD, Crout NMJ. 2011. Evaluating and reducing a model of radiocaesium soil-plant uptake. J. Environ. Radioact. 102: 262-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.11.017. · DOI
  6. Wall DP, Plunkett M. (Eds.). 2016. Major and micro nutrient advice for productive agricultural crops. 4th Edn. Wexford: Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Co. Available from https://www. teagasc.ie/media/website/publications/2016/soil-fertility- green.pdf. Cite this article as: Brown JE, Beresford NA, Hosseini A, Barnett CL. 2020. Applying process-based models to the Borssele scenario. Radioprotection 55(HS1): S109-S117

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, J. E., Beresford, N. A., Hosseini, A., & Barnett, C. L.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (NO)
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
Venue
Radioprotection
Publisher
EDP Sciences
Published
2020-04-29
Volume
55
Pages
S109-S117
ISSN
  • 0033-8451 (ISSN-L)
  • 1769-700X
OpenAlex
W3023321520
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radioprotection (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (662287)
  • Norges Forskningsråd (223268/F50, project number 223268/F50, 223268)
  • Euratom Research and Training Programme (2014-2018, 662287)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Radioactive contamination and transfer
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Nuclear and radioactivity studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
Keywords
mechanistic model, radionuclide transfer, trophic transfer, cesium-137, strontium-90, bioavailability, soil chemistry, soil type, spatial variability, JRODOS, Argos, dose estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review