The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protective association of aspirin/NSAIDs and esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 · Cited by 17,582
Schulz (1995) · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520290060030 · Cited by 5,634
Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
Jüni, P., Altman, D. G., & Egger, M. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42 · Cited by 3,309
The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis
Jüni, P. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.11.1054 · Cited by 1,981
Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors and the Antiplatelet Effects of Aspirin
Catella-Lawson, F., Reilly, M. P., Kapoor, S. C., Cucchiara, A. J., DeMarco, S., Tournier, B., Vyas, S. N., & FitzGerald, G. A. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa003199 · Cited by 1,394
Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials
Chalmers, T. C., Celano, P., Sacks, H. S., & Smith, H. (1983) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198312013092204 · Cited by 864
Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods
Greenland, S. (1994) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117248 · Cited by 511
Increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia and adjacent sites
Powell, J., & McConkey, C. (1990) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1990.314 · Cited by 381
Cited by
Barrett Esophagus and Risk of Esophageal Cancer: A Clinical Review
Spechler, S. J. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.226450 · Cited by 284
Yang, L., Francois, F., & Pei, Z. (2012) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-0934 · Cited by 192
Medication Usage and the Risk of Neoplasia in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus
Nguyen, D. M., El-Serag, H. B., Henderson, L., Stein, D., Bhattacharyya, A., & Sampliner, R. E. (2009) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.001 · Cited by 159
Caloric Restriction Mimetics in Nutrition and Clinical Trials
Hofer, S. J., Davinelli, S., Bergmann, M., Scapagnini, G., & Madeo, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.717343 · Cited by 109
Maintenance proton pump inhibition therapy and risk of oesophageal cancer
Brusselaers, N., Engstrand, L., & Lagergren, J. (2018) · Cancer Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.canep.2018.02.004 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Corley, D. A., Kerlikowske, K., Verma, R., & Buffler, P.
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-56
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993228606
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 6.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protective association of aspirin/NSAIDs and esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/gast.2003.50008
- The paper
- Corley, D. A., Kerlikowske, K., Verma, R., & Buffler, P. (2003). Protective association of aspirin/NSAIDs and esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2003.50008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
