Cited by 80Esophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentGastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsEsophageal and GI Pathology

Maintenance proton pump inhibition therapy and risk of oesophageal cancer

Brusselaers, Nele, Engstrand, Lars, Lagergren, Jesper·2018·Cancer Epidemiology

Abstract

Background The association of long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with oesophageal adenocarcinoma has been poorly defined. Our aim was to assess the risk of oesophageal cancer assessing confounding by indication.Methods This population-based cohort study included all 796,492 adults exposed to maintenance therapy with PPIs in Sweden in 2005-2012. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (and squamous cell carcinoma as a comparison) among long-term PPI users relative to the corresponding background population. The different indications for maintenance PPI therapy were analysed separately.Results Among all individuals using maintenance PPI therapy, the overall SIR of oesophageal adenocarcinoma was 3.93 (95% CI 3.63-4.24). The SIRs of adenocarcinoma were increased also among individuals without gastro-oesophageal reflux disease who used PPIs for indications not associated with any increased risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. For example, the SIRs among participants using maintenance PPI therapy because of maintenance treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and aspirin were 2.74 (95% CI 1.96-3.71) and 2.06 (95% CI 1.60-2.60), respectively. The SIRs of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma were increased for most investigated indications, but to a lesser degree than for oesophageal adenocarcinoma.Conclusion In conclusion, the long term use of PPIs is associated with increased risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in the absence of other risk factors. Long term use of PPIs should be addressed with caution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.canep.2018.02.004

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brusselaers, N., Engstrand, L., & Lagergren, J.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Science for Life Laboratory (SE)
Corresponding author
Brusselaers, Nele
Venue
Cancer Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
53
Pages
172-177
ISSN
1877-7821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793897631
Cited by
80
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11
FWCI
10.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal and GI Pathology
Keywords
proton pump inhibitors, esophageal adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, long-term drug use, confounding by indication, gastroesophageal reflux disease, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, cancer risk
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Esophageal Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sweden, Cohort Studies, Proton Pump Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review