Cited by 1,138Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchPancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances

American gastroenterological association institute guideline on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts

Open access
Vege, Santhi Swaroop, Ziring, Barry, Jain, Rajeev, Moayyedi, Paul, Adams, Megan A., Dorn, Spencer D., Dudley-Brown, Sharon L., Flamm, Steven L. +10 more·2015·Gastroenterology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.01.015

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-risk groups for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma include people with inherited predisposition, people with pancreatic cystic lesions, and people older than 50 years with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

    “Here, we review groups at high risk for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, including individuals with inherited predisposition and patients with pancreatic cystic lesions.”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [21]

  • An incidental pancreatic cyst seen on MRI has a 10 in 100,000 chance of being a mucinous invasive malignancy and a 17 in 100,000 chance of being a ductal cancer.

    “It is estimated that a cyst seen incidentally on MRI has a 10 in 100 000 chance of being a mucinous invasive malignancy, and a 17 in 100 000 chance of being a ductal cancer.21”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [21]

  • The 5% lifetime-risk target group includes individuals with at least two first-degree relatives with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, patients with hereditary pancreatitis or particular genetic syndromes, and individuals with mucinous cystic lesions of the pancreas.

    “This target includes individuals with at least two first-degree relatives with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, patients with hereditary pancreatitis or particular genetic syndromes (eg, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, or germline mutations in the CDKN2A, BRCA2, or PALB2),6,54 and individuals with mucinous cystic lesions of the pancreas.19–21”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [21]

  • Guidelines recommend immediate surgical resection for any pancreatic lesion with high-risk stigmata and regular surveillance with interval imaging for all mucinous or indeterminate lesions.

    “Guidelines recommend immediate surgical resection for any lesion with high-risk stigmata, and regular surveillance with interval imaging (MRI or endoscopic ultrasound) for all mucinous or indeterminate lesions.21,60”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [21]

  • Surveillance protocols for pancreatic cysts typically recommend cross-sectional imaging once every 6 months in the first year and annually thereafter if no changes are detected.

    “Surveillance protocols vary between the different guidelines, but typically recommend cross-sectional imaging once every 6 months in the first year, and annually thereafter if no changes are detected.”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [21]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vege, S. S., Ziring, B., Jain, R., Moayyedi, P., Adams, M. A., Dorn, S. D., Dudley-Brown, S. L., Flamm, S. L., Gellad, Z. F., Gruss, C. B., Kosinski, L. R., Lim, J. K., Romero, Y., Rubenstein, J. H., Smalley, W. E., Sultan, S., Weinberg, D. S., & Yang, Y.-X.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants (US)
  • Hamilton Health Sciences (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
148
Issue
4
Pages
819-822
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016448153
Cited by
1,138
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 116 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 25
FWCI
46.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Yale University
  • Vanderbilt University
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Northwestern University
  • University of Minnesota
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
  • Feinberg School of Medicine
  • Medical School, University of Michigan
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Keywords
pancreatic cysts, mucinous pancreatic cysts, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, endoscopic ultrasound, fine needle aspiration cytology, magnetic resonance imaging, pancreatic surgery, dysplasia
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Gastroenterology, Humans, Pancreatic Cyst, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Societies, Medical, Risk Assessment, Disease Management, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, Incidental Findings, Asymptomatic Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review