The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and Validation of the Rome IV Diagnostic Questionnaire for Adults
Open accessAbstract
The Rome IV Diagnostic Questionnaires were developed to screen for functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), serve as inclusion criteria in clinical trials, and support epidemiological surveys. Separate questionnaires were developed for adults, children/adolescents, and infants/toddlers. For the adult questionnaire, we first surveyed 1,162 adults without gastrointestinal disorders, and recommended the 90 th percentile symptom frequency as the threshold for defining what is abnormal. Diagnostic questions were formulated and verified with clinical experts using a recursive process. The diagnostic sensitivity of the questionnaire was tested in 843 patients from 9 gastroenterology clinics, with a focus on clinical diagnoses of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), functional constipation (FC), and functional dyspepsia (FD). Sensitivity was 62.7% for IBS, 54.7% for FD, and 32.2% for FC. Specificity, assessed in a population sample of 5,931 adults, was 97.1% for IBS, 93.3% for FD, and 93.6% for FC. Excess overlap among IBS, FC, and FD was a major contributor to reduced diagnostic sensitivity, and when overlap of IBS with FC was permitted, sensitivity for FC diagnosis increased to 73.2%. All questions were understandable to at least 90% of individuals, and Rome IV diagnoses were reproducible in ¾ of patients after one month. Validation of the pediatric questionnaires is ongoing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This feature makes the Rome IV criteria potentially more specific than Rome III.”
From British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of irritable bowel syndrome (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This change reflected the findings of a normative survey showing that adopting a higher threshold for the frequency of abdominal pain required to meet criteria for IBS would lead to fewer healthy people in the general population being misclassified as having IBS, 9 and therefore risk being 'medicalised', and having to take drugs for the condition.”
From British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of irritable bowel syndrome (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“Our study should also not be extrapolated to the other EDS subtypes, such as vascular EDS, which have recognised and potentially catastrophic gastrointestinal complications. 14”
From Rome IV Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders and Health Impairment in Subjects With Hypermobility Spectrum Disorders or Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“To overcome these issues, an international consortium published updated guidelines in 2017, whereby far more stringent criteria will hopefully improve the diagnostic specificity of hEDS and allow clear distinction from HSD. 14,15”
From Rome IV Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders and Health Impairment in Subjects With Hypermobility Spectrum Disorders or Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2005) · PubMed · Cited by 7,011
The PHQ-15: Validity of a New Measure for Evaluating the Severity of Somatic Symptoms
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2002) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-200203000-00008 · Cited by 3,415
ROME III: The Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
Sheth, A. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/mcg.0b013e31804bbe26 · Cited by 1,974
Ware, J., Kosinski, M., Dewey, J., Gandek, B., Kisinski, M., Ware, J. E., & Dewey, J. M. (2001) · Cited by 824
Predictive Value of The Rome Criteria for Diagnosing The Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Vanner, S., Depew, W. T., Paterson, W. G., DaCosta, L. R., Groll, A., Simon, J. B., & Djurfeldt, M. (1999) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01437.x · Cited by 262
Self-citationWong, R. K., Palsson, O. S., Turner, M. J., Levy, R. L., Feld, A. D., von Korff, M., & Whitehead, W. E. (2010) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2010.200 · Cited by 204
Self-citationHeidelbaugh, J. J., Stelwagon, M., Miller, S. A., Shea, E. P., & Chey, W. D. (2015) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2015.67 · Cited by 159
Self-citationFord, A., Talley, N., van Zanten, S. V., Vakil, N., Simel, D., & Moayyedi, P. (2008) · Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) · doi:10.1001/jama.300.15.1793 · Cited by 132
Helgeland, H., Flagstad, G., Grøtta, J., Vandvik, P. O., Kristensen, H., & Markestad, T. (2009) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0b013e31818de3ab · Cited by 119
Utility of red flag symptom exclusions in the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome
WHITEHEAD, W. E., PALSSON, O. S., FELD, A. D., LEVY, R. L., VON KORFF, M., TURNER, M. J., & DROSSMAN, D. A. (2006) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02956.x · Cited by 118
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sperber, A. D., Bangdiwala, S. I., Drossman, D. A., Ghoshal, U. C., Simren, M., Tack, J., Whitehead, W. E., Dumitrascu, D. L., Fang, X., Fukudo, S., et al. (2021) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.014 · Cited by 2,263
Self-citationRome IV—Functional GI Disorders: Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction
Drossman, D. A., & Hasler, W. L. (2016) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.035 · Cited by 1,928
Dietary fibre in gastrointestinal health and disease
Gill, S. K., Rossi, M., Bajka, B., & Whelan, K. (2021) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-020-00375-4 · Cited by 979
Schmulson, M. J., & Drossman, D. A. (2017) · Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility · doi:10.5056/jnm16214 · Cited by 788
Ford, A. C., Harris, L. A., Lacy, B. E., Quigley, E. M. M., & Moayyedi, P. (2018) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.15001 · Cited by 619
Metadata
- Authors
- Palsson, O. S., Whitehead, W. E., van Tilburg, M. A. L., Chang, L., Chey, W., Crowell, M. D., Keefer, L., Lembo, A. J., Parkman, H. P., Rao, S. S. C., Sperber, A., Spiegel, B., Tack, J., Vanner, S., Walker, L. S., Whorwell, P., & Yang, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Michigan Medicine (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Temple University (US)
- Augusta University (US)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Kingston General Hospital (CA)
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
- Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Palsson, Olafur S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1481-1491
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2344547018
- Cited by
- 719
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 79 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 10
- FWCI
- 43.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Keywords
- Rome IV criteria, functional gastrointestinal disorders, irritable bowel syndrome, functional constipation, functional dyspepsia, sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic overlap, reproducibility, questionnaire validation, adults
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
