Cited by 1,207Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentHepatitis B Virus Studies

Surveillance imaging and alpha fetoprotein for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis

Open access
Tzartzeva, Kristina, Obi, Joseph, Rich, Nicole E., Parikh, Neehar D., Marrero, Jorge A., Yopp, Adam, Waljee, Akbar K., Singal, Amit G.·2018·Gastroenterology

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Society guidelines differ in their recommendations for surveillance to detect early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis. We compared the performance of surveillance imaging, with or without alpha fetoprotein (AFP), for early detection of HCC in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Two reviewers searched MEDLINE and SCOPUS from January 1990 through August 2016 to identify published sensitivity and specificity of surveillance strategies for overall and early detection of HCC. Pooled estimates were calculated and compared using the DerSimonian and Laird method for a random effects model. The study was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies (comprising 13,367 patients) characterized sensitivity of imaging with or without AFP measurement for detection of HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Ultrasound detected any stage HCC with 84% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 76%-92%), but early-stage HCC with only 47% sensitivity (95% CI 33%-61%). In studies comparing ultrasound with vs without AFP measurement, ultrasound detected any stage HCC with a lower level of sensitivity than ultrasound plus AFP measurement (relative risk [RR] 0.88; 95% CI 0.83-0.93) and early-stage HCC with a lower level of sensitivity than ultrasound plus AFP measurement (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.71-0.93). However, ultrasound alone detected HCC with a higher level of specificity than ultrasound plus AFP measurement (RR 1.08; 95% CI 1.05-1.09). Ultrasound with vs without AFP detected early-stage HCC with 63% sensitivity (95% CI 48%-75%) and 45% sensitivity (95% CI 30%-62%), respectively (P = .002). Only 4 studies evaluated computed tomography or magnetic resonance image-based surveillance, which detected HCC with 84% sensitivity (95% CI 70%-92%). CONCLUSIONS: We found ultrasound alone has a low sensitivity to detect early stage HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Addition of AFP to ultrasound significantly increases sensitivity of early HCC detection in clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.064

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ultrasound-based surveillance has low sensitivity for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at an early stage, particularly in adults with MASLD-related cirrhosis and obesity.

    “As ultrasound-based surveillance has a low sensitivity for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at an early-stage, particularly in adults with MASLD-related cirrhosis and obesity, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) measurement can be combined with ultrasound in individuals at high risk ( LoE 3, open recommendation, consensus ).”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [250]

    The Results report low pooled sensitivity (47%) for detecting early HCC with ultrasound. The Discussion reports lower ultrasound sensitivity in patients with obesity or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, but says the meta-analysis could not evaluate these patient subgroups directly; its implication for NAFLD-related cirrhosis is framed as a suggestion rather than an established subgroup finding. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Individuals with MASLD have increased odds of persistent poor visualisation with a pooled sensitivity of 45% for ultrasound alone and increased risk of false positive or indeterminate results.

    “However, individuals with MASLDhaveincreasedoddsofpersistentpoorvisualisation with a pooled sensitivity of 45% for ultrasound alone and increased risk of false positive or indeterminate results. 250,251”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [250]

    The Results (Ultrasound with AFP for HCC Detection; page not provided) report 45% pooled sensitivity for ultrasound alone in early HCC detection, but not specifically among people with MASLD. The Discussion reports lower-quality imaging in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and mentions false-positive and indeterminate ultrasound results; it does not establish increased odds of persistent poor visualisation or an increased risk of those results in people with MASLD. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Combined use of AFP and ultrasound increases sensitivity for detection of early HCC from 45% to 63%.

    “Inameta-analysisof13,367individuals,thecombined useofAFPandultrasoundwasreportedtoincreasethesensitivity for detection of early HCC from 45% to 63%. 250”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Giardina MG Matarazzo M Morante R Lucariello A Varriale A Guardasole V De Marco G Serum alpha-L-fucosidase activity and early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study of patients with cirrhosis Cancer 1998 83 2468 74 9874450

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tzartzeva, K., Obi, J., Rich, N. E., Parikh, N. D., Marrero, J. A., Yopp, A., Waljee, A. K., & Singal, A. G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Singal, Amit G.
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
154
Issue
6
Pages
1706-1718.e1
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2786099441
Cited by
1,207
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 153 · 2025: 170 · 2024: 168 · 2023: 180 · 2022: 180 · 2021: 141 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 25
FWCI
12.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA230694, R01CA212008, R01CA222900)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK007745)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Hepatitis B Virus Studies
Keywords
hepatocellular carcinoma, liver cirrhosis, cancer surveillance, alpha-fetoprotein, ultrasonography, early cancer detection, sensitivity and specificity, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, alpha-Fetoproteins, Female, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Liver Neoplasms, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Ultrasonography, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review