Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determining Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Starting Age of Screening Based on Lifestyle, Environmental, and Genetic Factors

Open access
Jeon, Jihyoun, Du, Mengmeng, Schoen, Robert E., Hoffmeister, Michael, Newcomb, Polly A., Berndt, Sonja I., Caan, Bette, Campbell, Peter T., Chan, Andrew T., Chang-Claude, Jenny, Giles, Graham G., Gong, Jian, Harrison, Tabitha A., Huyghe, Jeroen R., Jacobs, Eric J., Li, Li, Lin, Yi, Le Marchand, Loïc, Potter, John D., Qu, Conghui, Bien, Stephanie A., Zubair, Niha, Macinnis, Robert J., Buchanan, Daniel D., Hopper, John L., Cao, Yin, Nishihara, Reiko, Rennert, Gad, Slattery, Martha L., Thomas, Duncan C., Woods, Michael O., Prentice, Ross L., Gruber, Stephen B., Zheng, Yingye, Brenner, Hermann, Hayes, Richard B., White, Emily, Peters, Ulrike, Hsu, Li·2018·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background & Aims Guidelines for initiating colorectal cancer (CRC) screening are based on family history but do not consider lifestyle, environmental, or genetic risk factors. We developed models to determine risk of CRC, based on lifestyle and environmental factors and genetic variants, and to identify an optimal age to begin screening. Methods We collected data from 9748 CRC cases and 10,590 controls in the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium and the Colorectal Transdisciplinary study, from 1992 through 2005. Half of the participants were used to develop the risk determination model and the other half were used to evaluate the discriminatory accuracy (validation set). Models of CRC risk were created based on family history, 19 lifestyle and environmental factors (E-score), and 63 CRC-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms identified in genome-wide association studies (G-score). We evaluated the discriminatory accuracy of the models by calculating area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values, adjusting for study, age, and endoscopy findings for the validation set. We used the models to project the 10-year absolute risk of CRC for a given risk profile and recommend ages to begin screening, in comparison to CRC risk for an average individual at 50 years of age, using external population incidence rates for non-Hispanic whites from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program registry. Results In our models, E-score and G-score each determined risk of CRC with greater accuracy than family history. A model that combined both scores and family history estimated CRC risk with an AUC value of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.62–0.64) for men and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.61–0.63) for women; AUC values based on only family history ranged from 0.53 to 0.54 and those based only E-score or G-score ranged from 0.59 to 0.60. Although screening is recommended to begin at age 50 years for individuals with no family history of CRC, starting ages calculated based on combined E-score and G-score differed by 12 years for men and 14 for women, for individuals with the highest vs the lowest 10% of risk. Conclusions We used data from 2 large international consortia to develop CRC risk calculation models that included genetic and environmental factors along with family history. These determine risk of CRC and starting ages for screening with greater accuracy than the family history only model, which is based on the current screening guideline. These scoring systems might serve as a first step toward developing individualized CRC prevention strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.02.021

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 95 references

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Jeon, J., Du, M., Schoen, R. E., Hoffmeister, M., Newcomb, P. A., Berndt, S. I., Caan, B., Campbell, P. T., Chan, A. T., Chang-Claude, J., Giles, G. G., Gong, J., Harrison, T. A., Huyghe, J. R., Jacobs, E. J., Li, L., Lin, Y., Le Marchand, L., Potter, J. D., Qu, C., Bien, S. A., Zubair, N., Macinnis, R. J., Buchanan, D. D., Hopper, J. L., Cao, Y., Nishihara, R., Rennert, G., Slattery, M. L., Thomas, D. C., Woods, M. O., Prentice, R. L., Gruber, S. B., Zheng, Y., Brenner, H., Hayes, R. B., White, E., Peters, U., & Hsu, L.
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
154
Issue
8
Pages
2152-2164.e19
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2788766073
Cited by
312
References
95
FWCI
14.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determining Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Starting Age of Screening Based on Lifestyle, Environmental, and Genetic Factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.02.021
The paper
Jeon, J., Du, M., Schoen, R. E., Hoffmeister, M., Newcomb, P. A., Berndt, S. I., Caan, B., Campbell, P. T., Chan, A. T., Chang-Claude, J., Giles, G. G., Gong, J., Harrison, T. A., Huyghe, J. R., Jacobs, E. J., Li, L., Lin, Y., Le Marchand, L., Potter, J. D., . . . Hsu, L. (2018). Determining Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Starting Age of Screening Based on Lifestyle, Environmental, and Genetic Factors. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.02.021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.