Cited by 35Receptor Mechanisms and SignalingGastrointestinal motility and disordersNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

G-protein–coupled receptors are dynamic regulators of digestion and targets for digestive diseases

Open access
Canals, Meritxell, Poole, Daniel P., Veldhuis, Nicholas A., Schmidt, Brian L., Bunnett, Nigel W.·2019·Gastroenterology

Abstract

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of transmembrane signaling proteins. In the gastrointestinal tract, GPCRs expressed by epithelial cells sense contents of the lumen, and GPCRs expressed by epithelial cells, myocytes, neurons, and immune cells participate in communication among cells. GPCRs control digestion, mediate digestive diseases, and coordinate repair and growth. GPCRs are the target of more than one third of therapeutic drugs, including many drugs used to treat digestive diseases. Recent advances in structural, chemical, and cell biology research have shown that GPCRs are not static binary switches that operate from the plasma membrane to control a defined set of intracellular signals. Rather, GPCRs are dynamic signaling proteins that adopt distinct conformations and subcellular distributions when associated with different ligands and intracellular effectors. An understanding of the dynamic nature of GPCRs has provided insights into the mechanism of activation and signaling of GPCRs and has shown opportunities for drug discovery. We review the allosteric modulation, biased agonism, oligomerization, and compartmentalized signaling of GPCRs that control digestion and digestive diseases. We highlight the implications of these concepts for the development of selective and effective drugs to treat diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.266

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Confounders in terms of prevalent POTS co-morbidities (such as IBS or depression) were not controlled for in the study of serum activity against GPCRs.

    “Confounders in terms of prevalent POTS co-morbidities (such as IBS or depression) which may have elicited their own bi-directional effects on immune responses (Canals et al., 2019”

    From Self-reported symptom burden in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS): A narrative review of observational and interventional studies (2023) · cites this paper as Canals et al., 2019

    The sections on GPCR oligomers and allosteric modulators discuss IBS treatments, but do not address POTS, serum activity against GPCRs, or whether a study controlled for comorbidities. Searches for POTS, serum autoantibodies, depression, and bidirectional immune responses found no passage supporting the attributed claim. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 140

  1. [1]Hauser AS, Attwood MM, Rask-Andersen M, Trends in GPCR drug discovery: new agents, targets and indications. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2017; 16: 829. 29075003 PMC6882681
  2. [2]Chaudhari N, Roper SD. The cell biology of taste. J Cell Biol 2010; 190: 285. 20696704 PMC2922655
  3. [3]Reimann F, Tolhurst G, Gribble Fiona M. G-protein–coupled receptors in intestinal chemosensation. Cell Metab 2012; 15: 421– 431. 22482725
  4. [4]Kong W, McConalogue K, Khitin LM, Luminal trypsin may regulate enterocytes through proteinase-activated receptor 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94: 8884– 8889. 9238072 PMC23180
  5. [6]Abu-Hayyeh S, Ovadia C, Lieu T, Prognostic and mechanistic potential of progesterone sulfates in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and pruritus gravidarum. Hepatology 2016; 63: 1287– 1298. 26426865 PMC4869673
  6. [7]Alemi F, Kwon E, Poole DP, The TGR5 receptor mediates bile acid-induced itch and analgesia. J Clin Invest 2013; 123: 1513– 1530. 23524965 PMC3613908
  7. [8]Solinski HJ, Gudermann T, Breit A. Pharmacology and signaling of MAS-related G protein-coupled receptors. Pharmacol Rev 2014; 66: 570– 597. 24867890
  8. [9]McNeil BD, Pundir P, Meeker S, Identification of a mast-cell–specific receptor crucial for pseudo-allergic drug reactions. Nature 2015; 519: 237– 241. 25517090 PMC4359082
  9. [10]Stead RH, Tomioka M, Quinonez G, Intestinal mucosal mast cells in normal and nematode-infected rat intestines are in intimate contact with peptidergic nerves. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1987; 84: 2975– 2979. 2437589 PMC304783
  10. [12]Geppetti P, Veldhuis NA, Lieu T, G protein-coupled receptors: dynamic machines for signaling pain and itch. Neuron 2015; 88: 635– 649. 26590341
  11. [13]Liang YL, Khoshouei M, Deganutti G, Cryo-EM structure of the active, Gs-protein complexed, human CGRP receptor. Nature 2018; 561: 492– 497. 30209400 PMC6166790
  12. [14]Liang YL, Khoshouei M, Glukhova A, Phase-plate cryo-EM structure of a biased agonist-bound human GLP-1 receptor-Gs complex. Nature 2018; 555: 121– 125. 29466332
  13. [15]Rasmussen SG, Choi HJ, Fung JJ, Structure of a nanobody-stabilized active state of the beta(2) adrenoceptor. Nature 2011; 469: 175– 180. 21228869 PMC3058308
  14. [16]Rasmussen SG, DeVree BT, Zou Y, Crystal structure of the beta2 adrenergic receptor-Gs protein complex. Nature 2011; 477: 549– 555. 21772288 PMC3184188
  15. [17]Shukla AK, Westfield GH, Xiao K, Visualization of arrestin recruitment by a G-protein–coupled receptor. Nature 2014; 512: 218– 222. 25043026 PMC4134437
  16. [18]Christopoulos A Advances in G protein-coupled receptor allostery: from function to structure. Mol Pharmacol 2014; 86: 463– 478. 25061106
  17. [19]Kenakin T Functional selectivity and biased receptor signaling. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2011; 336: 296– 302. 21030484
  18. [20]Manglik A, Kruse AC, Kobilka TS, Crystal structure of the micro-opioid receptor bound to a morphinan antagonist. Nature 2012; 485: 321– 326. 22437502 PMC3523197
  19. [21]Wu H, Wacker D, Mileni M, Structure of the human kappa-opioid receptor in complex with JDTic. Nature 2012; 485: 327– 332. 22437504 PMC3356457
  20. [22]Irannejad R, Tomshine JC, Tomshine JR, Conformational biosensors reveal GPCR signalling from endosomes. Nature 2013; 495: 534– 538. 23515162 PMC3835555
  21. [23]Irannejad R, Tsvetanova NG, Lobingier BT, Effects of endocytosis on receptor-mediated signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2015; 35: 137– 143. 26057614 PMC4529812
  22. [24]Jensen DD, Lieu T, Halls ML, Neurokinin 1 receptor signaling in endosomes mediates sustained nociception and is a viable therapeutic target for prolonged pain relief. Sci Transl Med 2017; 9(392). PMC6034632 28566424
  23. [25]Jimenez-Vargas NN, Pattison LA, Zhao P, Protease-activated receptor-2 in endosomes signals persistent pain of irritable bowel syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115: E7438– E7447. 30012612 PMC6077730
  24. [26]Murphy JE, Padilla BE, Hasdemir B, Endosomes: a legitimate platform for the signaling train. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106: 17615– 17622. 19822761 PMC2764915
  25. [27]Yarwood RE, Imlach WL, Lieu T, Endosomal signaling of the receptor for calcitonin gene-related peptide mediates pain transmission. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114: 12309– 12314. 29087309 PMC5699040
  26. [28]Thomsen ARB, Jensen DD, Hicks GA, Therapeutic targeting of endosomal G-protein–coupled receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2018; 39: 879– 891. 30180973 PMC6508874
  27. [29]Gautam D, Heard TS, Cui Y, Cholinergic stimulation of salivary secretion studied with M1 and M3 muscarinic receptor single- and double-knockout mice. Mol Pharmacol 2004; 66: 260– 267. 15266016
  28. [30]Matsui M, Motomura D, Fujikawa T, Mice lacking M2 and M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are devoid of cholinergic smooth muscle contractions but still viable. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 10627– 10632. 12486155 PMC6758427
  29. [31]Thomsen M, Sorensen G, Dencker D. Physiological roles of CNS muscarinic receptors gained from knockout mice. Neuropharmacology 2018; 136: 411– 420. 28911965 PMC5845799
  30. [32]Christopoulos A, Kenakin T. G protein-coupled receptor allosterism and complexing. Pharmacol Rev 2002; 54: 323– 374. 12037145
  31. [33]Monod J, Changeux JP, Jacob F. Allosteric proteins and cellular control systems. J Mol Biol 1963; 6: 306– 329. 13936070
  32. [34]De Lean A, Stadel JM, Lefkowitz RJ. A ternary complex model explains the agonist-specific binding properties of the adenylate cyclase-coupled beta-adrenergic receptor. J Biol Chem 1980; 255: 7108– 7117. 6248546
  33. [35]Gurevich VV, Pals-Rylaarsdam R, Benovic JL, Agonist-receptor-arrestin, an alternative ternary complex with high agonist affinity. J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 28849– 28852. 9360951
  34. [36]Dorr P, Westby M, Dobbs S, Maraviroc (UK-427, 857), a potent, orally bioavailable, and selective small-molecule inhibitor of chemokine receptor CCR5 with broad-spectrum anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 4721– 4732. 16251317 PMC1280117
  35. [37]Block GA, Martin KJ, de Francisco AL, Cinacalcet for secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1516– 1525. 15071126
  36. [38]Gentry PR, Sexton PM, Christopoulos A. Novel allosteric modulators of G protein-coupled receptors. J Biol Chem 2015; 290: 19478– 19488. 26100627 PMC4528113
  37. [40]Kurimoto E, Matsuda S, Shimizu Y, An approach to discovering novel muscarinic M1 receptor positive allosteric modulators with potent cognitive improvement and minimized gastrointestinal dysfunction. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2018; 364: 28– 37. 29025977
  38. [41]Thomsen M, Lindsley CW, Conn PJ, Contribution of both M1 and M4 receptors to muscarinic agonistmediated attenuation of the cocaine discriminative stimulus in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2012; 220: 673– 685. 21964721 PMC3314162
  39. [42]Sako Y, Kurimoto E, Mandai T, TAK-071, a novel M1 positive allosteric modulator with low cooperativity, improves cognitive function in rodents with few cholinergic side effects. Neuropsychopharmacology 2019; 44: 950– 960. 30089885 PMC6461781
  40. [43]Uslaner JM, Kuduk SD, Wittmann M, Preclinical to human translational pharmacology of the novel M1 positive allosteric modulator MK-7622. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2018; 365: 556– 566. 29563325
  41. [45]Burford NT, Clark MJ, Wehrman TS, Discovery of positive allosteric modulators and silent allosteric modulators of the mu-opioid receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110: 10830– 10835. 23754417 PMC3696790
  42. [46]Livingston KE, Traynor JR. Disruption of the Na+ ion binding site as a mechanism for positive allosteric modulation of the mu-opioid receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111: 18369– 18374. 25489080 PMC4280615
  43. [47]DiCello JJ, Saito A, Rajasekhar P, Inflammation-associated changes in DOR expression and function in the mouse colon. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2018; 315: G544– G559. 29927325 PMC6230691
  44. [49]Turck D, Berard H, Fretault N, Comparison of racecadotril and loperamide in children with acute diarrhoea. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999; 13(Suppl 6): 27– 32. 10646049
  45. [50]Burford NT, Livingston KE, Canals M, Discovery, synthesis, and molecular pharmacology of selective positive allosteric modulators of the delta-opioid receptor. J Med Chem 2015; 58: 4220– 4229. 25901762 PMC4703104
  46. [51]Keywood C, Wakefield M, Tack J. A proof-of-concept study evaluating the effect of ADX10059, a metabotropic glutamate receptor-5 negative allosteric modulator, on acid exposure and symptoms in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut 2009; 58: 1192– 1199. 19460767 PMC2719084
  47. [52]Zerbib F, Bruley des Varannes S, Roman S, Randomised clinical trial: effects of monotherapy with ADX10059, a mGluR5 inhibitor, on symptoms and reflux events in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33: 911– 921. 21320138
  48. [53]Wacker D, Wang C, Katritch V, Structural features for functional selectivity at serotonin receptors. Science 2013; 340: 615– 619. 23519215 PMC3644390
  49. [54]Stoeber M, Jullie D, Lobingier BT, A genetically encoded biosensor reveals location bias of opioid drug action. Neuron 2018; 98: 963– 976 e5. 29754753 PMC6481295
  50. [55]Ossovskaya VS, Bunnett NW. Protease-activated receptors: contribution to physiology and disease. Physiol Rev 2004; 84: 579– 621. 15044683
  51. [56]Edgington-Mitchell LE. Pathophysiological roles of proteases in gastrointestinal disease. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2016; 310: G234– G239. 26702140
  52. [57]DeFea KA, Zalevsky J, Thoma MS, beta-arrestin–dependent endocytosis of proteinase-activated receptor 2 is required for intracellular targeting of activated ERK1/2. J Cell Biol 2000; 148: 1267– 1281. 10725339 PMC2174299
  53. [58]Zhao P, Lieu T, Barlow N, Cathepsin S causes inflammatory pain via biased agonism of PAR2 and TRPV4. J Biol Chem 2014; 289: 27215– 27234. 25118282 PMC4175355
  54. [59]Zhao P, Lieu T, Barlow N, Neutrophil elastase activates protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR2) and transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) to cause inflammation and pain. J Biol Chem 2015; 290: 13875– 13887. 25878251 PMC4447962
  55. [60]Kenakin T Is the quest for signaling bias worth the effort? Mol Pharmacol 2018; 93: 266– 269. 29348268
  56. [61]Bohn LM, Gainetdinov RR, Lin FT, Mu-opioid receptor desensitization by beta-arrestin-2 determines morphine tolerance but not dependence. Nature 2000; 408: 720– 723. 11130073
  57. [62]Bohn LM, Lefkowitz RJ, Gainetdinov RR, Enhanced morphine analgesia in mice lacking beta-arrestin 2. Science 1999; 286: 2495– 2498. 10617462
  58. [63]Bohn LM, Raehal KM. Opioid receptor signaling: relevance for gastrointestinal therapy. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2006; 6: 559– 563. 16935560
  59. [64]Raehal KM, Schmid CL, Medvedev IO, Morphine-induced physiological and behavioral responses in mice lacking G protein-coupled receptor kinase 6. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009; 104: 187– 196. 19497686 PMC2771341
  60. [65]Raehal KM, Walker JK, Bohn LM. Morphine side effects in beta-arrestin 2 knockout mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2005; 314: 1195– 1201. 15917400
  61. [66]Akbarali HI, Inkisar A, Dewey WL. Site and mechanism of morphine tolerance in the gastrointestinal tract. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26: 1361– 1367. 25257923 PMC4423201
  62. [67]Kang M, Maguma HT, Smith TH, The role of beta-arrestin2 in the mechanism of morphine tolerance in the mouse and guinea pig gastrointestinal tract. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2012; 340: 567– 576. 22129596 PMC3286318
  63. [68]Ross GR, Gabra BH, Dewey WL, Morphine tolerance in the mouse ileum and colon. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2008; 327: 561– 572. 18682567 PMC2574683
  64. [69]Chen X-T, Pitis P, Liu G, Structure–activity relationships and discovery of a G protein biased µ opioid receptor ligand, [(3-methoxythiophen-2-yl)methyl]({2-[(9R)-9-(pyridin-2-yl)-6-oxaspiro-[4.5]decan-9-yl]ethyl}) amine (TRV130), for the treatment of acute severe pain. J Med Chem 2013; 56: 8019– 8031. 24063433
  65. [70]DeWire SM, Yamashita DS, Rominger DH, A G protein-biased ligand at the mu-opioid receptor is potently analgesic with reduced gastrointestinal and respiratory dysfunction compared with morphine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2013; 344: 708– 717. 23300227
  66. [71]Singla N, Minkowitz HS, Soergel DG, A randomized, Phase IIb study investigating oliceridine (TRV130), a novel micro-receptor G-protein pathway selective (mu-GPS) modulator, for the management of moderate to severe acute pain following abdominoplasty. J Pain Res 2017; 10: 2413– 2424. 29062240 PMC5638571
  67. [72]Soergel DG, Subach RA, Burnham N, Biased agonism of the mu-opioid receptor by TRV130 increases analgesia and reduces on-target adverse effects versus morphine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers. Pain 2014; 155: 1829– 1835. 24954166
  68. [73]Manglik A, Lin H, Aryal DK, Structure-based discovery of opioid analgesics with reduced side effects. Nature 2016; 537: 185– 190. 27533032 PMC5161585
  69. [76]Hill R, Disney A, Conibear A, The novel mu-opioid receptor agonist PZM21 depresses respiration and induces tolerance to antinociception. Br J Pharmacol 2018; 175: 2653– 2661. 29582414 PMC6003631
  70. [77]Charfi I, Audet N, Bagheri Tudashki H, Identifying ligand-specific signalling within biased responses: focus on delta opioid receptor ligands. Br J Pharmacol 2015; 172: 435– 448. 24665881 PMC4292958
  71. [78]Gallantine EL, Meert TF. A comparison of the antinociceptive and adverse effects of the mu-opioid agonist morphine and the delta-opioid agonist SNC80. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2005; 97: 39– 51. 15943758
  72. [79]Eisenstein TK, Rahim RT, Feng P, Effects of opioid tolerance and withdrawal on the immune system. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 2006; 1: 237– 249. 18040801
  73. [80]Pradhan AA, Walwyn W, Nozaki C, Ligand-directed trafficking of the delta-opioid receptor in vivo: two paths toward analgesic tolerance. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 16459– 16468. 21147985 PMC3086517
  74. [81]Le Bourdonnec B, Windh RT, Ajello CW, Potent, orally bioavailable delta opioid receptor agonists for the treatment of pain: discovery of N,N-diethyl-4-(5-hydroxyspiro[chromene-2,4ˊ-piperidine]-4-yl)benzamide (ADL5859). J Med Chem 2008; 51: 5893– 5896. 18788723
  75. [82]Le Bourdonnec B, Windh RT, Leister LK, Spirocyclic delta opioid receptor agonists for the treatment of pain: discovery of N,N-diethyl-3-hydroxy-4-(spiro [chromene-2,4ˊ-piperidine]-4-yl) benzamide (ADL5747). J Med Chem 2009; 52: 5685– 5702. 19694468
  76. [83]Pin JP, Neubig R, Bouvier M, International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXVII. Recommendations for the recognition and nomenclature of G protein-coupled receptor heteromultimers. Pharmacol Rev 2007; 59: 5– 13. 17329545
  77. [84]Jones KA, Borowsky B, Tamm JA, GABA(B) receptors function as a heteromeric assembly of the subunits GABA(B)R1 and GABA(B)R2. Nature 1998; 396: 674– 679. 9872315
  78. [85]Kaupmann K, Malitschek B, Schuler V, GABA(B)-receptor subtypes assemble into functional heteromeric complexes. Nature 1998; 396: 683– 687. 9872317
  79. [86]White JH, Wise A, Main MJ, Heterodimerization is required for the formation of a functional GABA(B) receptor. Nature 1998; 396: 679– 682. 9872316
  80. [87]Kawakami S, Uezono Y, Makimoto N, Characterization of GABA(B) receptors involved in inhibition of motility associated with acetylcholine release in the dog small intestine: possible existence of a heterodimer of GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) subunits. J Pharmacol Sci 2004; 94: 368– 375. 15107576
  81. [88]Torashima Y, Uezono Y, Kanaide M, Presence of GABA(B) receptors forming heterodimers with GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) subunits in human lower esophageal sphincter. J Pharmacol Sci 2009; 111: 253– 259. 19893276
  82. [89]Hyland NP, Cryan JF. A gut feeling about GABA: focus on GABA(B) receptors. Front Pharmacol 2010; 1: 124. 21833169 PMC3153004
  83. [90]Lehmann A, Jensen JM, Boeckxstaens GE. GABAB receptor agonism as a novel therapeutic modality in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Adv Pharmacol 2010; 58: 287– 313. 20655487
  84. [91]Bulenger S, Marullo S, Bouvier M. Emerging role of homo- and heterodimerization in G-protein–coupled receptor biosynthesis and maturation. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2005; 26: 131– 137. 15749158
  85. [92]Terrillon S, Bouvier M. Roles of G-protein–coupled receptor dimerization. EMBO Rep 2004; 5: 30– 34. 14710183 PMC1298963
  86. [93]Kuszak AJ, Pitchiaya S, Anand JP, Purification and functional reconstitution of monomeric mu-opioid receptors: allosteric modulation of agonist binding by Gi2. J Biol Chem 2009; 284: 26732– 26741. 19542234 PMC2785361
  87. [94]Huang W, Manglik A, Venkatakrishnan AJ, Structural insights into micro-opioid receptor activation. Nature 2015; 524: 315– 321. 26245379 PMC4639397
  88. [95]He L, Fong J, von Zastrow M, Regulation of opioid receptor trafficking and morphine tolerance by receptor oligomerization. Cell 2002; 108: 271– 282. 11832216
  89. [96]Gomes I, Gupta A, Filipovska J, A role for heterodimerization of mu and delta opiate receptors in enhancing morphine analgesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101: 5135– 5139. 15044695 PMC387386
  90. [97]Scherrer G, Imamachi N, Cao YQ, Dissociation of the opioid receptor mechanisms that control mechanical and heat pain. Cell 2009; 137: 1148– 1159. 19524516 PMC3683597
  91. [98]Erbs E, Faget L, Scherrer G, A mu-delta opioid receptor brain atlas reveals neuronal co-occurrence in subcortical networks. Brain Struct Funct 2015; 220: 677– 702. 24623156 PMC4341027
  92. [99]Wang D, Tawfik VL, Corder G, Functional divergence of delta and mu opioid receptor organization in CNS pain circuits. Neuron 2018; 98: 90– 108 e5. 29576387 PMC5896237
  93. [100]Fujita W, Gomes I, Devi LA. Heteromers of mu-delta opioid receptors: new pharmacology and novel therapeutic possibilities. Br J Pharmacol 2015; 172: 375– 387. 24571499 PMC4292954
  94. [101]Zhu Y, King MA, Schuller AG, Retention of supraspinal delta-like analgesia and loss of morphine tolerance in delta opioid receptor knockout mice. Neuron 1999; 24: 243– 252. 10677041
  95. [102]Egan TM, North RA. Both mu and delta opiate receptors exist on the same neuron. Science 1981; 214: 923– 924. 6272393
  96. [103]Poole DP, Pelayo JC, Scherrer G, Localization and regulation of fluorescently labeled delta opioid receptor, expressed in enteric neurons of mice. Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 982– 991 e18. 21699782 PMC4429902
  97. [104]Guerrero-Alba R, Valdez-Morales EE, Jimenez-Vargas NN, Co-expression of mu and delta opioid receptors by mouse colonic nociceptors. Br J Pharmacol 2018; 175: 2622– 2634. 29579315 PMC6003632
  98. [105]Fujita W, Gomes I, Dove LS, Molecular characterization of eluxadoline as a potential ligand targeting mudelta opioid receptor heteromers. Biochem Pharmacol 2014; 92: 448– 456. 25261794 PMC4769596
  99. [106]Dove LS, Lembo A, Randall CW, Eluxadoline benefits patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea in a phase 2 study. Gastroenterology 2013; 145: 329– 338 e1. 23583433
  100. [107]Fant RV, Henningfield JE, Cash BD, Eluxadoline demonstrates a lack of abuse potential in phase 2 and 3 studies of patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15: 1021– 1029 e6. 28167156
  101. [108]Bowden JJ, Garland AM, Baluk P, Direct observation of substance P-induced internalization of neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptors at sites of inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994; 91: 8964– 8968. 7522326 PMC44727
  102. [109]Poole DP, Lieu T, Pelayo JC, Inflammation-induced abnormalities in the subcellular localization and trafficking of the neurokinin 1 receptor in the enteric nervous system. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2015; 309: G248– G259. 26138465 PMC4537929
  103. [110]Mantyh PW, DeMaster E, Malhotra A, Receptor endocytosis and dendrite reshaping in spinal neurons after somatosensory stimulation. Science 1995; 268: 1629– 1632. 7539937
  104. [111]Steinhoff MS, von Mentzer B, Geppetti P, Tachykinins and their receptors: contributions to physiological control and the mechanisms of disease. Physiol Rev 2014; 94: 265– 301. 24382888 PMC3929113
  105. [112]Deddish PA, Marcic BM, Tan F, Neprilysin inhibitors potentiate effects of bradykinin on b2 receptor. Hypertension 2002; 39: 619– 623. 11882619
  106. [113]Okamoto A, Lovett M, Payan DG, Interactions between neutral endopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.11) and the substance P (NK1) receptor expressed in mammalian cells. Biochem J 1994; 299: 683– 693. 7514869 PMC1138075
  107. [114]Sturiale S, Barbara G, Qiu B, Neutral endopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.11) terminates colitis by degrading substance P. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96: 11653– 11658. 10500232 PMC18089
  108. [115]Lu B, Figini M, Emanueli C, The control of micro-vascular permeability and blood pressure by neutral endopeptidase. Nat Med 1997; 3: 904– 907. 9256283
  109. [116]Peterson YK, Luttrell LM. The diverse roles of arrestin scaffolds in G protein-coupled receptor signaling. Pharmacol Rev 2017; 69: 256– 297. 28626043 PMC5482185
  110. [118]Calebiro D, Nikolaev VO, Gagliani MC, Persistent cAMP-signals triggered by internalized G-protein–coupled receptors. PLoS Biol 2009; 7: e1000172. 19688034 PMC2718703
  111. [119]Ferrandon S, Feinstein TN, Castro M, Sustained cyclic AMP production by parathyroid hormone receptor endocytosis. Nat Chem Biol 2009; 5: 734– 742. 19701185 PMC3032084
  112. [120]Irannejad R, von Zastrow M. GPCR signaling along the endocytic pathway. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2014; 27: 109– 116. 24680436 PMC4968408
  113. [121]Tsvetanova NG, von Zastrow M. Spatial encoding of cyclic AMP signaling specificity by GPCR endocytosis. Nat Chem Biol 2014; 10: 1061– 1065. 25362359 PMC4232470
  114. [122]Buxton IL, Brunton LL. Compartments of cyclic AMP and protein kinase in mammalian cardiomyocytes. J Biol Chem 1983; 258: 10233– 10239. 6309796
  115. [123]Berridge MJ. Calcium microdomains: organization and function. Cell Calcium 2006; 40: 405– 412. 17030366
  116. [124]Halls ML, Canals M. Genetically encoded FRET bio-sensors to illuminate compartmentalised GPCR signalling. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2018; 39: 148– 157. 29054309
  117. [125]Willoughby D, Halls ML, Everett KL, A key phosphorylation site in AC8 mediates regulation of Ca(2+)-dependent cAMP dynamics by an AC8-AKAP79-PKA signalling complex. J Cell Sci 2012; 125: 5850– 5859. 22976297 PMC3575714
  118. [126]DeFea KA, Vaughn ZD, O’Bryan EM, The proliferative and antiapoptotic effects of substance P are facilitated by formation of a beta-arrestin–dependent scaffolding complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97: 11086– 11091. 10995467 PMC27152
  119. [127]Moon C, Zhang W, Ren A, Compartmentalized accumulation of cAMP near complexes of multidrug resistance protein 4 (MRP4) and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) contributes to drug-induced diarrhea. J Biol Chem 2015; 290: 11246– 11257. 25762723 PMC4416832
  120. [128]Oakley RH, Laporte SA, Holt JA, Association of beta-arrestin with G protein-coupled receptors during clathrin-mediated endocytosis dictates the profile of receptor resensitization. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 32248– 32257. 10542263
  121. [129]Oakley RH, Laporte SA, Holt JA, Differential affinities of visual arrestin, beta arrestin1, and beta arrestin2 for G protein-coupled receptors delineate two major classes of receptors. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 17201– 17210. 10748214
  122. [130]Schmidlin F, Dery O, Bunnett NW, Heterologous regulation of trafficking and signaling of G protein-coupled receptors: beta-arrestin–dependent interactions between neurokinin receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99: 3324– 3329. 11880656 PMC122517
  123. [131]Cattaruzza F, Cottrell GS, Vaksman N, Endothelin-converting enzyme 1 promotes re-sensitization of neurokinin 1 receptor-dependent neurogenic inflammation. Br J Pharmacol 2009; 156: 730– 739. 19222484 PMC2697762
  124. [132]Padilla BE, Cottrell GS, Roosterman D, Endothelin-converting enzyme-1 regulates endosomal sorting of calcitonin receptor-like receptor and beta-arrestins. J Cell Biol 2007; 179: 981– 997. 18039931 PMC2099187
  125. [133]Pelayo JC, Poole DP, Steinhoff M, Endothelin-converting enzyme-1 regulates trafficking and signalling of the neurokinin 1 receptor in endosomes of myenteric neurones. J Physiol 2011; 589: 5213– 5230. 21878523 PMC3225675
  126. [134]Roosterman D, Cottrell GS, Padilla BE, Endothelin-converting enzyme 1 degrades neuropeptides in endosomes to control receptor recycling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104: 11838– 11843. 17592116 PMC1913888
  127. [135]Jensen DD, Halls ML, Murphy JE, Endothelin-converting enzyme 1 and beta-arrestins exert spatiotemporal control of substance P-induced inflammatory signals. J Biol Chem 2014; 289: 20283– 20294. 24898255 PMC4106342
  128. [136]Zhao P, Canals M, Murphy JE, Agonist-biased trafficking of somatostatin receptor 2A in enteric neurons. J Biol Chem 2013; 288: 25689– 25700. 23913690 PMC3764777
  129. [137]Roosterman D, Kempkes C, Cottrell GS, Endothelin-converting enzyme-1 degrades internalized somatostatin-14. Endocrinology 2008; 149: 2200– 2207. 18276747 PMC2329273
  130. [138]Oberg KE, Reubi JC, Kwekkeboom DJ, Role of somatostatins in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor development and therapy. Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 742– 753 e1. 20637207
  131. [139]Cahill TJ III, Thomsen AR, Tarrasch JT, Distinct conformations of GPCR-beta-arrestin complexes mediate desensitization, signaling, and endocytosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114: 2562– 2567. 28223524 PMC5347553
  132. [140]Thomsen ARB, Plouffe B, Cahill TJ III, GPCR-G protein-beta-arrestin super-complex mediates sustained g protein signaling. Cell 2016; 166: 907– 919. 27499021 PMC5418658
  133. [142]Rolland-Fourcade C, Denadai-Souza A, Cirillo C, Epithelial expression and function of trypsin-3 in irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 2017; 66: 1767– 1778. 28096305 PMC5595105
  134. [143]Brimblecombe RW, Duncan WA, Durant GJ, The pharmacology of cimetidine, a new histamine H2-receptor antagonist. Br J Pharmacol 1975; 53: 435P– 436P. PMC1666433 236798
  135. [145]Paek J, Kalocsay M, Staus DP, Multidimensional tracking of GPCR signaling via peroxidase-catalyzed proximity labeling. Cell 2017; 169: 338– 349 e11. 28388415 PMC5514552
  136. [146]Driehuis E, Clevers H. CRISPR/Cas 9 genome editing and its applications in organoids. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2017; 312: G257– G265. 28126704
  137. [147]Gulbransen BD. Emerging tools to study enteric neuro-muscular function. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2017; 312: G420– G426. 28280142 PMC5451564
  138. [148]Zhu H, Roth BL. DREADD: a chemogenetic GPCR signaling platform. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2014; 18(1). PMC4368861 25522378
  139. [149]McClain JL, Fried DE, Gulbransen BD. Agonist-evoked Ca(2) signaling in enteric glia drives neural programs that regulate intestinal motility in mice. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 1: 631– 645. 26693173 PMC4673674
  140. [150]Grubisic V, Gulbransen BD. Enteric glial activity regulates secretomotor function in the mouse colon but does not acutely affect gut permeability. J Physiol 2017; 595: 3409– 3424. 28066889 PMC5451715

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Canals, M., Poole, D. P., Veldhuis, N. A., Schmidt, B. L., & Bunnett, N. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Australian Research Council (AU)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Bunnett, Nigel W.
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
156
Issue
6
Pages
1600-1616
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913426593
Cited by
35
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NS102722, DK118971, DE026806)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH1810431)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1121029)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
G protein-coupled receptors, digestion, gastrointestinal diseases, gastrointestinal tract, allosteric modulation, biased agonism, receptor oligomerization, compartmentalized signaling, drug discovery, gastrointestinal epithelial cells
MeSH terms
Allosteric Regulation, Digestion, Digestive System Diseases, Humans, Endosomes, Signal Transduction, Dimerization, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review