Cited by 334Gastrointestinal motility and disordersInfant Health and DevelopmentInflammatory Bowel Disease

Eluxadoline for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea

Open access
Lembo, Anthony J., Lacy, Brian E., Zuckerman, Marc J., Schey, Ron, Dove, Leonard S., Andrae, David A., Davenport, J. Michael, McIntyre, Gail +3 more·2016·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background Effective and safe treatments are needed for patients who have irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with diarrhea. We conducted two phase 3 trials to assess the efficacy and safety of eluxadoline, a new oral agent with mixed opioid effects (μ- and κ-opioid receptor agonist and δ-opioid receptor antagonist), in patients with IBS with diarrhea. Methods We randomly assigned 2427 adults who had IBS with diarrhea to eluxadoline (at a dose of 75 mg or 100 mg) or placebo twice daily for 26 weeks (IBS-3002 trial) or 52 weeks (IBS-3001 trial). The primary end point was the proportion of patients who had a composite response of decrease in abdominal pain and improvement in stool consistency on the same day for at least 50% of the days from weeks 1 through 12 and from weeks 1 through 26. Results For weeks 1 through 12, more patients in the eluxadoline groups (75 mg and 100 mg) than in the placebo group reached the primary end point (IBS-3001 trial, 23.9% with the 75-mg dose and 25.1% with the 100-mg dose vs. 17.1% with placebo; P=0.01 and P=0.004, respectively; IBS-3002 trial, 28.9% and 29.6%, respectively, vs. 16.2%; P<0.001 for both comparisons). For weeks 1 through 26, the corresponding rates in IBS-3001 were 23.4% and 29.3% versus 19.0% (P=0.11 and P<0.001, respectively), and the corresponding rates in IBS-3002 were 30.4% and 32.7% versus 20.2% (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). The most common adverse events associated with 75 mg of eluxadoline and 100 mg of eluxadoline, as compared with placebo, were nausea (8.1% and 7.5% vs. 5.1%), constipation (7.4% and 8.6% vs. 2.5%), and abdominal pain (5.8% and 7.2% vs. 4.1%). Pancreatitis developed in 5 (2 in the 75-mg group and 3 in the 100-mg group) of the 1666 patients in the safety population (0.3%). Conclusions Eluxadoline is a new therapeutic agent that reduced symptoms of IBS with diarrhea in men and women, with sustained efficacy over 6 months in patients who received the 100-mg dose twice daily. (Funded by Furiex Pharmaceuticals, an affiliate of Allergan; IBS-3001 and IBS-3002 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01553591 and NCT01553747 , respectively.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1505180

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All these drugs (5-HT3 antagonists, eluxadoline, rifaximin) have demonstrated efficacy over placebo in IBS-D.

    “Although all these drugs have demonstrated efficacy over placebo”

    From Irritable bowel syndrome (2020) · cites this paper as [123]

    The Abstract reports that some patients with IBS-D may respond to rifaximin or alosetron, and the Discussion reports eluxadoline’s superiority to placebo with treatment effects similar to those reported for those drugs. The paper discusses alosetron, but does not establish placebo-superior efficacy for 5-HT3 antagonists as a class. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Paré P, Gray J, Lam S, et al. Health- related quality of life, work productivity, and health care resource utilization of subjects with irritable bowel syndrome: baseline results from LOGIC (Longitudi- nal Outcomes Study of Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Canada), a naturalistic study. Clin Ther 2006; 28: 1726-35.
  2. Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, et al. Bur- den of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenter- ology 2012; 143: 1179-87.
  3. Andresen V, Montori VM, Keller J, West CP, Layer P, Camilleri M. Effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) type 3 antagonists on symptom relief and con- stipation in nonconstipated irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta- analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 545-55.
  4. Chang L, Ameen VZ, Dukes GE, Mc- Sorley DJ, Carter EG, Mayer EA. A dose- ranging, phase II study of the efficacy and safety of alosetron in men with diarrhea- predominant IBS. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 115-23.
  5. Holzer P. Opioid receptors in the gas- trointestinal tract. Regul Pept 2009; 155: 11-7.
  6. Bauer AJ, Sarr MG, Szurszewski JH. Opioids inhibit neuromuscular transmis- sion in circular muscle of human and baboon jejunum. Gastroenterology 1991; 101: 970-6.
  7. Ananthan S. Opioid ligands with mixed mu/delta opioid receptor inter- actions: an emerging approach to novel analgesics. AAPS J 2006; 8(1): E118-E125.
  8. Dietis N, Guerrini R, Calo G, Salva- dori S, Rowbotham DJ, Lambert DG. Simultaneous targeting of multiple opioid receptors: a strategy to improve side-effect profile. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 38-49.
  9. Wade PR, Palmer JM, McKenney S, et al. Modulation of gastrointestinal func- tion by MuDelta, a mixed μ opioid recep- tor agonist/μ opioid receptor antagonist. Br J Pharmacol 2012; 167: 1111-25.
  10. Dove LS, Lembo A, Randall CW, et al. Eluxadoline benefits patients with irrita- ble bowel syndrome with diarrhea in a phase 2 study. Gastroenterology 2013; 145: 329-38.
  11. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, et al. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2016; 130: 1480-91.
  12. Handelsman L, Cochrane KJ, Aronson MJ, Ness R, Rubinstein KJ, Kanof PD. Two new rating scales for opiate withdrawal. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1987; 13: 293- 308.
  13. Camilleri M, Chey WY, Mayer EA, et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial of the serotonin type 3 receptor antagonist alosetron in women with diarrhea-pre- dominant irritable bowel syndrome. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 1733-40.
  14. Cann PA, Read NW, Holdsworth CD, Barends D. Role of loperamide and placebo in management of irritable bowel syn- drome (IBS). Dig Dis Sci 1984; 29: 239-47.
  15. Efskind PS, Bernklev T, Vatn MH. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial with loperamide in irritable bowel syn- drome. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996; 31: 463-8.
  16. Lavö B, Stenstam M, Nielsen AL. Lop- eramide in treatment of irritable bowel syndrome -a double-blind placebo con- trolled study. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1987; 130: 77-80.
  17. Lembo AJ, Olden KW, Ameen VZ, Gordon SL, Heath AT, Carter EG. Effect of alosetron on bowel urgency and global symptoms in women with severe, diarrhea- predominant irritable bowel syndrome: analysis of two controlled trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 675-82.
  18. Lembo T, Wright RA, Bagby B, et al. Alosetron controls bowel urgency and provides global symptom improvement in women with diarrhea-predominant irrita- ble bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 2662-70.
  19. Kagaya T, Takebe T, Koizumi M, Kata- oka S, Kamei T, Oyama K. Effect of long term alcohol feeding on the pancreas in rat. Gastroenterol Jpn 1979; 14: 327-35.
  20. Pandol SJ, Raraty M. Pathobiology of alcoholic pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2007; 7: 105-14.
  21. Shahedi K, Pandol SJ, Hu R. Oxidative stress and alcoholic pancreatitis. J Gastro- enterol Hepatol Res 2013; 2: 335-42.
  22. Guelrud M, Mendoza S, Rossiter G, Gelrud D, Rossiter A, Souney PF. Effect of local instillation of alcohol on sphincter of Oddi motor activity: combined ERCP and manometry study. Gastrointest En- dosc 1991; 37: 428-32.
  23. Viceconte G. Effects of ethanol on the sphincter of Oddi: an endoscopic mano- metric study. Gut 1983; 24: 20-7.
  24. Badalov N, Baradarian R, Iswara K, Li J, Steinberg W, Tenner S. Drug-induced acute pancreatitis: an evidence-based re- view. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 648-61.
  25. Hastier P, Longo F, Buckley M, Chich- manian RM, Delmont JP. Pancreatitis in- duced by codeine: a case report with posi- tive rechallenge. Gut 1997; 41: 705-6.
  26. Hastier P, Buckley MJ, Peten EP, et al. A new source of drug-induced acute pan- creatitis: codeine. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 3295-8.
  27. Howaizi M, Sbaï-Idrissi MS, Baillet P. Loperamide-induced acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2000; 24: 589-91. (In French.)
  28. Trivedi CD, Pitchumoni CS. Drug- induced pancreatitis: an update. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005; 39: 709-16.
  29. Behar J, Biancani P. Neural control of the sphincter of Oddi: physiologic role of enkephalins on the regulation of basal sphincter of Oddi motor activity in the cat. Gastroenterology 1984; 86: 134-41.
  30. Helm JF, Venu RP, Geenen JE, et al. Effects of morphine on the human sphinc- ter of Oddi. Gut 1988; 29: 1402-7.
  31. Mossberg SM, Bloom A, Berkowitz J, Ross G. Serum enzyme activities follow- ing morphine: a study of transaminase and alkaline phosphatase levels in normal persons and those with gallbladder dis- ease. Arch Intern Med 1962; 109: 429-37.
  32. Patch GG, Morton KA, Arias JM, Datz FL. Naloxone reverses pattern of obstruc- tion of the distal common bile duct in- duced by analgesic narcotics in hepatobi- liary imaging. J Nucl Med 1991; 32: 1270-2.
  33. Roberts-Thomson IC, Pannall PR, Toouli J. Relationship between morphine responses and sphincter of Oddi motility in undefined biliary pain after cholecys- tectomy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1989; 4: 317-24.
  34. Steinberg WM, Salvato RF, Toskes PP. The morphine-prostigmin provocative test -is it useful for making clinical deci- sions? Gastroenterology 1980; 78: 728-31.
  35. Thompson DR. Narcotic analgesic ef- fects on the sphincter of Oddi: a review of the data and therapeutic implications in treating pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 1266-72.
  36. Thune A, Jivegård L, Pollard H, Moreau J, Schwartz JC, Svanvik J. Loca- tion of enkephalinase and functional ef- fects of [Leu5]enkephalin and inhibition of enkephalinase in the feline main pan- creatic and bile duct sphincters. Clin Sci (Lond) 1992; 82: 169-73.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lembo, A. J., Lacy, B. E., Zuckerman, M. J., Schey, R., Dove, L. S., Andrae, D. A., Davenport, J. M., McIntyre, G., Lopez, R., Turner, L., & Covington, P. S.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
  • Temple University (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2016-01-21
Volume
374
Issue
3
Pages
242-253
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2330377679
Cited by
334
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
54.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
eluxadoline, irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, mu-opioid receptor agonists, kappa opioid receptor agonists, delta-opioid receptor antagonists, abdominal pain, stool consistency, drug safety and efficacy, nausea, constipation, adverse events, dose comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diarrhea, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Imidazoles, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatitis, Phenylalanine, Abdominal Pain, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review