The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Dirty Dozen: Twelve P-Value Misconceptions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702
Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence
Berger, J. O., & Sellke, T. (1987) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289131 · Cited by 548
Randomization, Statistics, and Causal Inference
Greenland, S. (1990) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199011000-00003 · Cited by 385
Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papers
García-Berthou, E., & Alcaraz, C. (2004) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-4-13 · Cited by 181
Cited by
The ASA Statement on p -Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108 · Cited by 6,306
Sensitivity analysis in observational research: Introducing the E-value
VanderWeele, T. J., & Ding, P. (2017) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m16-2607 · Cited by 6,350
Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations
Greenland, S., Senn, S. J., Rothman, K. J., Carlin, J. B., Poole, C., Goodman, S. N., & Altman, D. G. (2016) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3 · Cited by 3,200
Self-citationSensitivity and specificity of information criteria
(2019) · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz016 · Cited by 718
Five myths about variable selection
Heinze, G., & Dunkler, D. (2017) · Transplant International · doi:10.1111/tri.12895 · Cited by 528
Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015
Chavalarias, D., Wallach, J. D., Li, A. H. T., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1952 · Cited by 370
Rudolph, M. D., Graham, A. M., Feczko, E., Miranda-Dominguez, O., Rasmussen, J. M., Nardos, R., Entringer, S., Wadhwa, P. D., Buss, C., & Fair, D. A. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0128-y · Cited by 374
A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology
Etz, A., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149794 · Cited by 295
“306 Decades of reliance on orthodox statistical inference—which is known to overstate 307 the evidence against a null hypothesis [29–32]—have obfuscated the widespread problem 308 of small samples in psychological studies in general and in replication studies specifically.”
What exactly is ‘N’ in cell culture and animal experiments?
Lazic, S. E., Clarke-Williams, C. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2005282 · Cited by 291
When Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Is Unsuitable for Research: A Reassessment
Szucs, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00390 · Cited by 298
Pelsser, L. M., Frankena, K., Toorman, J., & Rodrigues Pereira, R. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169277 · Cited by 145
the Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group, Beam, C. A., MacCallum, C., Herold, K. C., Wherrett, D. K., Palmer, J., & Ludvigsson, J. (2017) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-016-4122-1 · Cited by 53
Zahrai, K., Veer, E., Ballantine, P. W., de Vries, H. P., & Prayag, G. (2022) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/joca.12449 · Cited by 53
Loss, C. M., Melleu, F. F., Domingues, K., Lino-de-Oliveira, C., & Viola, G. G. (2021) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2021.763428 · Cited by 44
Bayesian Data Analysis in Empirical Software Engineering Research
Furia, C. A., Feldt, R., & Torkar, R. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2019.2935974 · Cited by 42
Hanin, L. (2017) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0399-0 · Cited by 32
Barry, A. E., Szucs, L. E., Reyes, J. V., Ji, Q., Wilson, K. L., & Thompson, B. (2016) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198116669521 · Cited by 27
Teipel, S. J., Dyrba, M., Ballarini, T., Brosseron, F., Bruno, D., Buerger, K., Cosma, N.-C., Dechent, P., Dobisch, L., Düzel, E., et al. (2022) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-215196 · Cited by 20
Detection of data fabrication using statistical tools
Hartgerink, C. H. J., Voelkel, J. G., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jkws4 · Cited by 16
The Medical Outreach Team of the Drug Information Association Bayesian Scientific Working Group, Bray, R., Hartley, A., Wenkert, D., Muehlemann, N., Natanegara, F., Harrell, F. E., Wang, F., & Clark, J. (2023) · Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science · doi:10.1007/s43441-022-00482-1 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodman, S.
- Venue
- Seminars in Hematology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 135-140
- ISSN
- 0037-1963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095720871
- Cited by
- 680
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
