Cited by 548Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceProbability and Statistical ResearchStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence

Berger, James O., Sellke, Thomas·1987·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

James O. Berger, Thomas Sellke, Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 82, No. 397 (Mar., 1987), pp. 112-122

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2289131

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berger, J. O., & Sellke, T.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1987-03
Volume
82
Issue
397
Pages
112
ISSN
0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4243759473
Cited by
548
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 19
FWCI
9.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
point null hypothesis, p-values, statistical evidence, hypothesis testing, null hypothesis significance testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review