The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antibody Vectors for Imaging
Open accessAbstract
Non-invasive molecular imaging approaches include nuclear, optical, MRI, CT, ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging, which require accumulation of a signal delivered by a probe at the target site. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are high affinity molecules that can be used for specific, high signal delivery to cell surface molecules. However, their long circulation time in blood makes them unsuitable as imaging probes. Efforts to improve antibodies pharmacokinetics without compromising affinity and specificity have been made through protein engineering. Antibody variants that differ in antigen binding sites and size have been generated and evaluated as imaging probes to target tissues of interest. Fast clearing fragments such as single-chain Fv (scFv; 25 kDa) with one antigen binding site (monovalent) demonstrated low accumulation in tumors due the low exposure time to the target. Using scFv as building block to produce larger, bivalent fragments such as scFv dimers (diabodies, 50 kDa) and scFv-fusion proteins (80 kDa minibodies and 105 kDa scFv-Fc) resulted in higher tumor accumulation due to their longer residence time in blood. Imaging studies with these fragments following radiolabeling have demonstrated excellent, high contrast images in gamma cameras and PET scanners. Several studies have also investigated antibody fragments conjugated to fluorescence (near infrared dyes), bioluminescence (luciferases) and quantum dots for optical imaging and iron oxides nanoparticles for MRI. However, these studies indicate that there are several factors that influence successful targeting and imaging. These include stability of the antibody fragment, the labeling chemistry (direct or indirect), whether critical residues are modified, the number of antigen expressed on the cell, and whether the target has a rapid recycling rate or internalizes upon binding. The preclinical data presented are compelling and it is evident that antibody-based molecular imaging tracers will play an important future role in the diagnosis and management of cancer and other diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Agrawal, M., Ajazuddin, Tripathi, D. K., Saraf, S., Saraf, S., Antimisiaris, S. G., Mourtas, S., Hammarlund-Udenaes, M., & Alexander, A. (2017) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.05.019 · Cited by 356
An Effective Immuno-PET Imaging Method to Monitor CD8-Dependent Responses to Immunotherapy
Tavaré, R., Escuin-Ordinas, H., Mok, S., McCracken, M. N., Zettlitz, K. A., Salazar, F. B., Witte, O. N., Ribas, A., & Wu, A. M. (2016) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-1707 · Cited by 320
Self-citationNanobody: The “Magic Bullet” for Molecular Imaging?
Chakravarty, R., Goel, S., & Cai, W. (2014) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.8006 · Cited by 288
Molecular imaging of the tumor microenvironment
Zhou, Z., & Lu, Z.-R. (2017) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.07.012 · Cited by 253
Tumour targeting with radiometals for diagnosis and therapy
Ramogida, C. F., & Orvig, C. (2013) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c3cc41554f · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Olafsen, T., & Wu, A. M.
- Venue
- Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 167-181
- ISSN
- 0001-2998 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084108774
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibody Vectors for Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2009.12.005
- The paper
- Olafsen, T., & Wu, A. M. (2010). Antibody Vectors for Imaging. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2009.12.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.