Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A correlation between the pretransplantation MELD score and mortality in the first two years after liver transplantation

Onaca, Nicholas N., Levy, Marlon F., Sanchez, Edmund Q., Chinnakotla, Srinath, Fasola, Carlos G., Thomas, Mark J., Weinstein, Jeffrey S., Murray, Natalie G., Goldstein, Robert M., Klintmalm, Goran B.·2003·Liver Transplantation

Abstract

The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is now the criteria for allocation in liver transplantation for patients with chronic disease. Although the score has been effective in the prediction of mortality in patients awaiting liver transplantation, its abilities to predict posttransplantation outcome need study. The aim of this study is to compare outcome in the first 2 years after liver transplantation according to the pretransplantation MELD score. The study includes 669 consecutive patients who underwent primary liver transplantation between December 1993 and October 1999 in a single transplant center. Patients who died of malignancy were excluded from the series. Pretransplantation MELD score was calculated using the United Network for Organ Sharing formula. Patients were stratified according to MELD score less than 15, 15 to 24, and 25 and higher. Posttransplantation survival at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was significantly lower in the groups with a higher MELD score. The difference was significant for hepatitis C and noncholestatic liver diseases, but not cholestatic diseases. In patients with a MELD score between 15 and 24, survival was significantly greater with cholestatic diseases and lower in patients with hepatitis C. In our study, pretransplantation MELD score correlates with survival in the first 2 years after transplantation. There is a survival advantage for patients with cholestatic diseases compared with those with hepatitis C. These findings suggest the need to readjust MELD score-based allocation decisions to consider patient outcome

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/jlts.2003.50027

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Onaca, N. N., Levy, M. F., Sanchez, E. Q., Chinnakotla, S., Fasola, C. G., Thomas, M. J., Weinstein, J. S., Murray, N. G., Goldstein, R. M., & Klintmalm, G. B.
Venue
Liver Transplantation
Published
2003-02
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
117-123
ISSN
1527-6465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975532829
Cited by
202
References
1
FWCI
21.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A correlation between the pretransplantation MELD score and mortality in the first two years after liver transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/jlts.2003.50027
The paper
Onaca, N. N., Levy, M. F., Sanchez, E. Q., Chinnakotla, S., Fasola, C. G., Thomas, M. J., Weinstein, J. S., Murray, N. G., Goldstein, R. M., & Klintmalm, G. B. (2003). A correlation between the pretransplantation MELD score and mortality in the first two years after liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1053/jlts.2003.50027

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.