Cited by 815Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

Normative data for the HADS from a large non-clinical sample

Open access
Crawford, J. R., Henry, J. D., Crombie, C., Taylor, E. P.·2001·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide normative data for the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS). DESIGN: Repeated measures and correlational. METHODS: The HADS was administered to a non-clinical sample, broadly representative of the general adult UK population (N = 1792) in terms of the distributions of age, gender and occupational status. Correlational analysis was used to determine the influence of demographic variables on HADS scores. RESULTS: Demographic variables had only very modest influences on HADS scores. The reliability of the HADS is acceptable; the Anxiety and Depression scales are moderately correlated (.53). Tables to convert raw scores to percentiles are presented for females and males. CONCLUSIONS: The present normative data allow clinicians to assess the rarity of a given HADS score, and thus provide a useful supplement to existing cut-off scores.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/014466501163904

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crawford, J. R., Henry, J. D., Crombie, C., & Taylor, E. P.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Crawford, J. R.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-11
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
429-434
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W2014718757
Cited by
815
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 59
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
reference values, anxiety, depression, non-clinical population, scoring reliability, cut-off values
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Depression, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review