Cited by 33Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchCardiovascular and exercise physiologyRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Breathing retraining and exercise conditioning in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a physiological approach

Open access
GIGLIOTTI, F, ROMAGNOLI, I, SCANO, G·2003·Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

In this review we shall consider the commonest techniques to reduce dyspnea that are being applied to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) subjected to a pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP). Pursed lip breathing (PLB) and diaphragmatic breathing (DB) are breathing retraining strategies employed by COPD patients in order to relieve and control dyspnea. However, the effectiveness of PLB in reducing dyspnoea is controversial. Moreover, DB may be associated with asynchronous and paradoxical breathing movements, reflecting a decrease in the efficiency ofthe diaphragm. Exercise training (EXT) is a mandatory component of PRP.EXT has been shown to improve exercise performances and peripheral muscle strength. Recent studies have focused on the effect of EXT on breathlessness. However, concerns persist as to whether the decreased sensation of dyspnea for a given exercise stimulus is principally due to psychological benefits of rehabilitation or to improved physiological ability to perform exercise. The effect of EXT on breathlessness may be reinforced by inhaling oxygen. However, two studies have recently shown that breathing supplemental oxygen during training has either a marginal effect or no advantage over training. In a comprehensive PRP, strength training (ST) and arm endurance training (AET) could have a role in decreasing peripheral muscle weakness and metabolic and ventilatory requirements for AET. The role of unloading the respiratory muscles during E…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/rmed.2003.1434

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GIGLIOTTI, F., ROMAGNOLI, I., & SCANO, G.
Venue
Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-03
Volume
97
Issue
3
Pages
197-204
ISSN
0954-6111 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081161422
Cited by
33
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pursed-lip breathing, diaphragmatic breathing, breathing retraining, dyspnea, pulmonary rehabilitation, exercise training, supplemental oxygen, resistance training, peripheral muscle weakness, respiratory muscle unloading
MeSH terms
Breathing Exercises, Diaphragm, Humans, Oxygen, Posture, Respiratory Muscles, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review