CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 309Sleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related FatigueObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Insomnia and daytime functioning

Riedel, Brant W., Lichstein, Kenneth L.·2000·Sleep Medicine Reviews
DOI 10.1053/smrv.1999.0074
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Results from the present review challenge the assumption that daytime functioning deficits are associated with insomnia. Objectively-measured daytime sleepiness is not elevated in people with insomnia, and most cognitive/psychomotor tasks do not indicate deficits in people with insomnia. In contrast, a number of studies have found that people with insomnia self-report daytime symptoms such as elevated fatigue, mood disturbance and reduced quality of life. Studies including both objective and subjective daytime measures have generally found agreement between the two types of measures, with both typically indicating a lack of daytime impairment. The present review also summarizes evidence suggesting that reported daytime difficulties are produced by factors other than poor sleep, such as physiological or psychological arousal or sleep need misperception.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/smrv.1999.0074

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Rombaut, 1990, The quality of life of insomniacs questionnaire (QOLI), Med Sci Res, 18, 845
  2. Pedrosi, 1995, Daytime function and benzodiazepine effects in insomniacs compared to normals, Sleep Res, 24, 36
  3. Lichstein, 1996, The utility of pupillometric assessment in older adults with insomnia, J Clin Geropsychol, 2, 337
  4. McNair, 1981, Manual for the Profile of Mood States., San Diego: Education and Industrial Testing Service
  5. Beutler, 1978, Psychological variables in the diagnosis of insomnia, In Williams RL, Karacan I (eds) Sleep Disorders: Diagnosis and Treatment. New York: Wiley, 61
  6. Hoelscher, 1993, Initial validation of the Insomnia Impact Scale, Sleep Res, 22, 149

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 309

Related

Metadata

Authors
Riedel, B. W., & Lichstein, K. L.
Affiliations
University of Memphis (US)
Venue
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-06
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
277-298
ISSN
1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1053/smrv.1999.0074
OpenAlex
W2142607527
Cited by
309
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
insomnia, daytime functioning, daytime sleepiness, cognitive impairment, psychomotor performance, fatigue, mood disturbance, quality of life, arousal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review