Cited by 6,172Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchCancer survivorship and care

The Fatigue Severity Scale: Application to Patients With Multiple Sclerosis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Krupp, Lauren B.·1989·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

Fatigue is a prominent disabling symptom in a variety of medical and neurologic disorders. To facilitate research in this area, we developed a fatigue severity scale, subjected it to tests of internal consistency and validity, and used it to compare fatigue in two chronic conditions: systemic lupus erythematosus and multiple sclerosis. Administration of the fatigue severity scale to 25 patients with multiple sclerosis, 29 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, and 20 healthy adults revealed that the fatigue severity scale was internally consistent, correlated well with visual analogue measures, clearly differentiated controls from patients, and could detect clinically predicted changes in fatigue over time. Fatigue had a greater deleterious impact on daily living in patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus compared with controls. The results further showed that fatigue was largely independent of self-reported depressive symptoms and that several characteristics could differentiate fatigue that accompanies multiple sclerosis from fatigue that accompanies systemic lupus erythematosus. This study demonstrates (1) the clinical and research applications of a scale that measures fatigue severity and (2) helps to identify features that distinguish fatigue between two chronic medical disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krupp, L. B.
Affiliations
State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Krupp, Lauren B.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
1989-10-01
Volume
46
Issue
10
Pages
1121
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114242035
Cited by
6,172
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 359 · 2025: 425 · 2024: 403 · 2023: 369 · 2022: 426 · 2021: 418 · 2020: 361 · 2019: 343 · 2018: 275 · 2017: 235 · 2016: 254 · 2015: 262 · 2014: 243 · 2013: 240 · 2012: 193
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
Fatigue Severity Scale, fatigue severity, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, chronic fatigue, scale development, internal consistency, construct validity, depressive symptoms, impact on daily life, visual analogue scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Disability Evaluation, Fatigue, Humans, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Multiple Sclerosis, Neurologic Examination, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review