Cited by 39Neuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Opioid Use

Sex differences in opioid antinociception in rhesus monkeys: antagonism of fentanyl and U50,488 by quadazocine

Open access
Negus, S.Stevens, Zuzga, David S., Mello, Nancy K.·2002·The Journal of Pain

Abstract

Sex differences have been observed in the antinociceptive effects of opioids in rodents and rhesus monkeys. Sex differences in the affinity of opioid ligands for opioid receptors may contribute to these findings. To test this hypothesis, the relative affinity of the competitive opioid antagonist quadazocine for mu and kappa opioid receptors was determined in rhesus monkeys using in vivo pA(2) analysis. The antinociceptive effects of the mu opioid agonist fentanyl and the kappa opioid agonist U50,488 were determined alone and after pretreatment with quadazocine in 4 females and 4 males using a warm-water tail-withdrawal assay of thermal nociception. The relative potency of quadazocine antagonism of fentanyl and U50,488 in females and males was used to assess sex differences in the relative affinity of quadazocine for mu and kappa receptors. Fentanyl was equipotent in female and male monkeys, and quadazocine was equipotent as an antagonist of fentanyl in females and males. In contrast, U50,488 was significantly less potent in females, and quadazocine was less potent as an antagonist of U50,488 in females. These findings suggest that opioid ligands have similar affinity for mu receptors but lower affinity for at least some kappa receptors in female than in male rhesus monkeys.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1054/jpai.2002.124734

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [41]41. Negus SS: Sex and gonadal steroid hormone levels as determinants of opioid antinociception in rhesus monkeys. NIDA Res Monogr in press

Authors
Negus, S. S., Zuzga, D. S., & Mello, N. K.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Pain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-06
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
218-226
ISSN
1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016310385
Cited by
39
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
sex differences, opioid antinociception, fentanyl, U50,488, mu-opioid receptor, kappa opioid receptor, receptor binding affinity, competitive antagonists, thermal nociception, rhesus monkeys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review