Cited by 16Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and DisordersTreatment of Major Depression

Depressive symptoms and disorders, levels of functioning and psychosocial stress: an integrative hypothesis

Patten, S.B.·1999·Medical Hypotheses

Abstract

The objective of this manuscript is to propose an integrative conceptual model linking depressive disorders and depressive symptoms. Existing conceptual models of depression etiology tend to make this distinction in an arbitrary way. For example, in the current edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), there is a requirement that severe and persistent depressive symptoms be present for a period of two weeks or more before the depressive syndrome qualifies as a major depressive disorder. The concept of psychosocial stress is a potentially unifying concept relating depressive symptoms to disorders, as stress is a risk factor for both depressive symptoms and depressive disorders. Furthermore, a key feature of the depressive disorders is that they are associated with psychosocial dysfunction, which may be conceptualized as an inability to adapt to environmental stress. The hypothesis presented here is that subclinical depressive symptoms represent an adaptive biological response pattern to psychosocial stress, fostering adaptation in the face of a changing (stressful) environment. However, when a threshold of symptom severity is exceeded, the depressive syndrome becomes maladaptive, impairing adaptation to environmental stress and leading to an accumulation of stressful circumstances and experiences. As such, a vicious cycle may be created, leading, perhaps, to the occurrence of a depressive disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1054/mehy.1998.0747

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence that depression increases the risk for functional decline independent of the presence or severity of medical illness suggests that somatic comorbidities do not fully explain the relationship between depressive symptoms and functional ability.

    “Evidence that depression increases the risk for functional decline independent of the presence or severity of medical illness (Ng, Niti, Zaw, and Kua 2009;Patten 1999;Steffens, Hays, and Krishnan 1999) further suggests that somatic comorbidities do not fully explain the relationship between depressive symptoms and functional ability.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patten, S. B.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Patten, S.B.
Venue
Medical Hypotheses
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-09
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
210-216
ISSN
0306-9877 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131277785
Cited by
16
References
26
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Hypotheses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
depressive symptoms, depressive disorders, psychosocial stress, subthreshold depression, stress adaptation, maladaptive coping, vicious circle, etiology of depression, integrative conceptual model
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Models, Psychological, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review