Cited by 328Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Stressful life events and genetic liability to major depression: genetic control of exposure to the environment?

KENDLER, KENNETH S., KARKOWSKI-SHUMAN, LAURA·1997·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background Although overwhelming evidence suggests that genetic and environmental risk factors both contribute to the aetiology of major depression (MD), we know little of how these two risk factor domains inter-relate. In particular, can the genetic liability to MD increase the risk of experiencing stressful life events (SLEs)? Methods Using discrete time survival analysis in a population-based sample of 2164 female twins, we examined whether the risks for nine personal and three aggregate network SLEs were predicted by the level of genetic liability to MD, indexed by the lifetime history of MD in monozygotic and dizygotic co-twins. Results Genetic liability to MD was associated with a significantly increased risk for six personal SLEs (assault, serious marital problems, divorce/breakup, job loss, serious illness and major financial problems) and one network SLE (trouble getting along with relatives/friends). This effect was not due to SLEs occurring during depressive episodes. Similar results were found using structural equation twin modelling. In contrast to the pattern observed with MD, the genetic liability to alcoholism impacted on the risk for being robbed and having trouble with the law. Conclusion In women, genetic risk factors for MD increase the probability of experiencing SLEs in the interpersonal and occupational/financial domains. Genes can probably impact on the risk for psychiatric illness by causing individuals to select themselves into high risk environments…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291797004716

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KENDLER, K. S., & KARKOWSKI-SHUMAN, L.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
1997-05
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
539-547
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2115182573
Cited by
328
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k05mh001277-05)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA009095, AA-09095)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-01277, R01MH040828, MH 40828)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
major depressive disorder, life events, genetic susceptibility, gene-environment interaction, twin studies, women, alcoholism, interpersonal stress
MeSH terms
Adult, Depressive Disorder, Disease Susceptibility, Family Health, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Longitudinal Studies, Models, Biological, Regression Analysis, Sampling Studies, Social Environment, Likelihood Functions, Odds Ratio, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review