Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 934

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

Open access
Dumonceau, Jean-Marc, Kapral, Christine, Aabakken, Lars, Papanikolaou, Ioannis S., Tringali, Andrea, Vanbiervliet, Geoffroy, Beyna, Torsten, Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario, Hritz, Istvan, Mariani, Alberto, Paspatis, Gregorios, Radaelli, Franco, Lakhtakia, Sundeep, Veitch, Andrew M., van Hooft, Jeanin E.·2020·Endoscopy

Abstract

Main Recommendations: Prophylaxis 1 ESGE recommends routine rectal administration of 100 mg of diclofenac or indomethacin immediately before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in all patients without contraindications to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 2 ESGE recommends prophylactic pancreatic stenting in selected patients at high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis (inadvertent guidewire insertion/opacification of the pancreatic duct, double-guidewire cannulation). Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 3 ESGE suggests against routine endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy before the insertion of a single plastic stent or an uncovered/partially covered self-expandable metal stent for relief of biliary obstruction. Weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4 ESGE recommends against the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 5 ESGE suggests antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP in the case of anticipated incomplete biliary drainage, for severely immunocompromised patients, and when performing cholangioscopy. Weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 6 ESGE suggests tests of coagulation are not routinely required prior to ERCP for patients who are not on anticoagulants and not jaundiced. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. Treatment 7 ESGE suggests against salvage pancreatic stenting in patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 8 ESGE suggests temporary placement of a biliary fully covered self-expandable metal stent for post-sphincterotomy bleeding refractory to standard hemostatic modalities. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 9 ESGE suggests to evaluate patients with post-ERCP cholangitis by abdominal ultrasonography or computed tomography (CT) scan and, in the absence of improvement with conservative therapy, to consider repeat ERCP. A bile sample should be collected for microbiological examination during repeat ERCP. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/a-1075-4080

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 81 references

Cited by

See all 934

Metadata

Authors
Dumonceau, J.-M., Kapral, C., Aabakken, L., Papanikolaou, I. S., Tringali, A., Vanbiervliet, G., Beyna, T., Dinis-Ribeiro, M., Hritz, I., Mariani, A., Paspatis, G., Radaelli, F., Lakhtakia, S., Veitch, A. M., & van Hooft, J. E.
Venue
Endoscopy
Published
2019-12-20
Volume
52
Issue
02
Pages
127-149
ISSN
  • 0013-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1438-8812
OpenAlex
W2996748935
Cited by
934
References
81
FWCI
47.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/a-1075-4080
The paper
Dumonceau, J.-M., Kapral, C., Aabakken, L., Papanikolaou, I. S., Tringali, A., Vanbiervliet, G., Beyna, T., Dinis-Ribeiro, M., Hritz, I., Mariani, A., Paspatis, G., Radaelli, F., Lakhtakia, S., Veitch, A. M., & van Hooft, J. E. (2020). ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1075-4080

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.