Cited by 22Electronic Health Records SystemsHealthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Addressing Alert Fatigue by Replacing a Burdensome Interruptive Alert with Passive Clinical Decision Support

Open access
Fallon, Anne, Haralambides, Kristina, Mazzillo, Justin, Gleber, Conrad·2024·Applied Clinical Informatics

Abstract

Background Recognizing that alert fatigue poses risks to patient safety and clinician wellness, there is a growing emphasis on evaluation and governance of electronic health record clinical decision support (CDS). This is particularly critical for interruptive alerts to ensure that they achieve desired clinical outcomes while minimizing the burden on clinicians. This study describes an improvement effort to address a problematic interruptive alert intended to notify clinicians about patients needing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) precautions and how we collaborated with operational leaders to develop an alternative passive CDS system in acute care areas. Objectives Our dual aim was to reduce the alert burden by redesigning the CDS to adhere to best practices for decision support while also improving the percent of admitted patients with symptoms of possible COVID who had appropriate and timely infection precautions orders. Methods Iterative changes to CDS design included adjustment to alert triggers and acknowledgment reasons and development of a noninterruptive rule-based order panel for acute care areas. Data on alert burden and appropriate precautions orders on symptomatic admitted patients were followed over time on run and attribute (p) and individuals-moving range control charts. Results At baseline, the COVID alert fired on average 8,206 times per week with an alert per encounter rate of 0.36. After our interventions, the alerts per week decreased to 1,449 and alerts per encounter to 0.07 equating to an 80% reduction for both metrics. Concurrently, the percentage of symptomatic admitted patients with COVID precautions ordered increased from 23 to 61% with a reduction in the mean time between COVID test and precautions orders from 19.7 to −1.3 minutes. Conclusion CDS governance, partnering with operational stakeholders, and iterative design led to successful replacement of a frequently firing interruptive alert with less burdensome passive CDS that improved timely ordering of COVID precautions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/a-2226-8144

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • False positive rates can contribute to unnecessary diagnostics and antimicrobial use, potentially avoidable ICU transfers, and alert fatigue.

    “False positive rates, on the other hand, can contribute to unnecessary diagnostics and antimicrobial use, potentially avoidable intensive care unit (ICU) transfers, and alert fatigue.6,7”

    From A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Externally Validated Epic Clinical Decision Support Tools (2026) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Background and Significance section says unnecessary interruptive alerts pose a risk of alert fatigue, and the Abstract reports that redesigning a frequently firing COVID alert reduced alert burden. The paper does not link false-positive rates to unnecessary diagnostics, antimicrobial use, or avoidable ICU transfers. Page numbers were not available for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fallon, A., Haralambides, K., Mazzillo, J., & Gleber, C.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Fallon, Anne
Venue
Applied Clinical Informatics
Published
2023-12-12
Volume
15
Issue
01
Pages
101-110
ISSN
1869-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389639911
Cited by
22
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Clinical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
alarm fatigue, interruptive alerts, electronic health records, clinician workload, patient safety, acute care
MeSH terms
Humans, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Medical Order Entry Systems, Clinical Governance, Electronic Health Records, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review