Cited by 2Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Psychosocial, Behavioral, and Medical Drivers of Gestational Diabetes among Racial-Ethnic Groups

Open access
Gardner, Austin B., Champion, Macie L., Janevic, Teresa, Yee, Lynn M., Battarbee, Ashley N.·2025·American Journal of Perinatology

Abstract

Abstract Certain racial and ethnic groups have historically been labeled “high-risk” for the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Our objective was to identify the psychosocial, behavioral, and medical factors associated with GDM and determine if they differ by race/ethnicity. Secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study of pregnant nulliparous individuals with singleton gestations (2010–2013). The primary outcome was GDM. Psychosocial, behavioral, and medical characteristics were compared by self-reported race/ethnicity. Multivariable logistic regression with backward selection identified factors associated with GDM. Interaction terms between race/ethnicity and risk factors were tested. Of 8,672 pregnant individuals, 61% were non-Hispanic White, 13% non-Hispanic Black, 17% Hispanic, 4% Asian, and 5% other. The incidence of GDM differed by race/ethnicity with 4% non-Hispanic White, 3% non-Hispanic Black, 5% Hispanic, 11% Asian, and 5% other (p < 0.001). Of 34 psychosocial, behavioral, and medical factors, those associated with GDM were parent with history of diabetes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33–2.23), non-English language (aOR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.14–5.79), daily calorie intake (aOR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.08–1.29), daily fiber intake (aOR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.75–0.94), maternal age (aOR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.37–1.70), prepregnancy BMI (aOR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.02–1.44), and waist circumference (aOR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.03–1.43). These associations did not differ based on race/ethnicity (interaction p-values > 0.1). Replacing race/ethnicity as a risk factor for GDM with significant upstream psychosocial, behavioral, and medical factors should be considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/a-2554-0925

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [22]Gandhi M, ACOG clinical practice update: screening for gestational and pregestational diabetes in pregnancy and postpartum. Obstet Gynecol 2024 42131962
  2. [32]Grobman WA, Executive summary: Workshop on social determinants of health and obstetrical outcomes, February 1–2, 2022, cosponsored by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, the Commonwealth Foundation, and the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health, with support from the Society for Women’s Health Research. SMFM STATEMENT. 2023 Mar; 223(3): PB18– B24 36473505

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gardner, A. B., Champion, M. L., Janevic, T., Yee, L. M., & Battarbee, A. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Gardner, Austin B.
Venue
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2025-03-29
Volume
42
Issue
15
Pages
2024-2031
ISSN
  • 0735-1631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-8785
OpenAlex
W4408963805
Cited by
1
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Perinatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092949, P30DK079626)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, racial and ethnic disparities, risk factors, psychosocial factors, maternal diet, dietary fiber intake, maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, waist circumference, family history of diabetes, language barriers, nulliparous women, singleton pregnancy, maternal health equity
MeSH terms
White, Adult, Black or African American, Ethnicity, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, Body Mass Index, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Diabetes, Gestational, White People, Racial Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review