Cited by 20Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsHeparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis

Laboratory Testing for Lupus Anticoagulants: Preexamination Variables, Mixing Studies, and Diagnostic Criteria

Ledford-Kraemer, Marlies·2008·Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis

Abstract

The latest international guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants (LA) date back to 1995 and are in need of revision. Various patterns of practice and interpretation by clinical laboratories have altered the intent or usage of the criteria and recommendations made at that time. Moreover, various topics in the preexamination phase of LA testing (such as the role of the clinician in test ordering, the impact of direct thrombin inhibitors or oral anticoagulant therapy, and patient biologic variation) need to be considered in future guidelines. In like fashion, examination issues relating to mixing studies will need critical review. Mixing studies have been applied to a variety of low-phospholipid LA screening assays, and no uniformity or standardization exists as to how these test results should be interpreted or if in fact they are suitable for identifying weak lupus anticoagulants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0028-1085481

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In theory, coagulation factors contained in PNP will correct the prolongation of the screening test if affected by a deficiency of one or more factors; if an inhibitor is present, the clotting time will remain prolonged.

    “In theory, the coagulation factors contained in PNP will correct the prolongation of the screening test, restoring a clotting time that falls in the range of normality, if affected by a deficiency of one (or more) factors; if an inhibitor is present, the clotting time will remain prolonged [46,47].”

    From Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass (2023) · cites this paper as [46]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ledford-Kraemer, M.
Corresponding author
Ledford-Kraemer, Marlies
Venue
Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis
Published
2008-06
Volume
34
Issue
04
Pages
380-388
ISSN
  • 0094-6176 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-9064
OpenAlex
W2030101380
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
Keywords
lupus anticoagulant, laboratory diagnosis, mixing studies, diagnostic criteria, direct thrombin inhibitors, oral anticoagulation, test ordering
MeSH terms
Anticoagulants, Diagnosis, Differential, Hematologic Tests, Humans, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review